Paper · 2021 · Asian Research Journal of Agriculture

Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Influenced by Planting Dates and Weed Management Systems

Tej Pratap Dubey; Rajan Sagar Chaudhary

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea is one of the major winter legumes of Nepal, grown in terai and inner terai predominantly. To ascertain the degree of variation exhibited by the weed management practices at different stages of chickpea crop growth due to influence of dates of sowing, an experiment was conducted during rabi season of consecutive years (2018-19 and 2019-20) at the farmer’s field in Bhairahawa, Rupandehi district, Lumbini Province, Nepal. This location has a typical sub tropical climate characterized by hot, dry summer and cool winter. The field experiment consisted of two factors: dates of sowing and weeds management practices and was conducted in split plot design with three replications. Three dates of sowing i.e. 10th November, 25th November and 5th December were allocated under main plot and eight weed management practices i.e. weedy, weed free (two hands weeding at 30 and 60 DAS), Pendimethalin(PRE)@1kg a.i. ha-1, Quizalofop(POST)@50g a.i. ha-1, Imazethapyr (POST)@37.5g a.i. ha-1, Pendimethalin (PRE)@1kg a.i. ha-1 followed by Quizalofop (POST) @50g a.i. ha-1, Pendimethalin (PRE)@1kg a.i. ha-1 followed by Imazethapyr (POST)@ 37.5 g a.i. ha-1 and Pendimethalin (PRE)@1kg a.i. ha-1 followed by mechanical weeding. The maximum and the minimum yield attributes were found to be significantly different in the 10th November-sown crop and the 5th December-sown crop, respectively. The Harvest index was recorded maximum under Pendimethalin (PRE) treated crop. Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea. It is vital to conduct further research in these areas to bring out eco-friendly and cost-effective alternatives.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea sown on 10 November had maximum yield attributes relative to 5 December sowing.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
10th November-sown crope0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
5th December-sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum and the minimum yield attributes were found to be significantly different in the 10th November-sown crop and the 5th December-sown crop, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea sown on 5 December had minimum yield attributes.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
5th December-sown crope0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
10th November-sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum and the minimum yield attributes were found to be significantly different in the 10th November-sown crop and the 5th December-sown crop, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin treatment gave maximum chickpea harvest index.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pendimethalin (PRE)e0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Harvest index was recorded maximum under Pendimethalin (PRE) treated crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by Quizalofop gave higher chickpea yield attributes than Imazethapyr.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST)e0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Imazethapyr treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by Quizalofop gave higher chickpea yield than Imazethapyr.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Imazethapyr treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave the lowest chickpea yield attributes and yield among herbicides.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Imazethapyr treatmente0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
Among herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr had a phytotoxic effect on chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Imazethapyr treatmente0
Outcome
phytotoxic effect on the crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend Imazethapyr for pulse crops such as chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among herbicides, Pendimethalin (PRE) followed by Quizalofop (POST) recorded more values of yield attributes and yield while that were the minimum in Imazethapyr treatment due to its phytotoxic effect on the crop, so use of this herbicide is not recommended pulse crops like chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1751 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

quizalofop · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.