Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Influence of soil agro-techniques and rootstock on management of apple replant diseases

D.P. Sharma; Niranjan Singh; K.K. Thakur

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The replant problem has shown symptoms of declining productivity and longevity of apple orchards in several apple growing areas of Himachal Pradesh. Due to limited land and choice of crops for smaller microclimatic niches and incomparable economic equivalence of other fruits with apple, orchardists are compelled to replant old apple orchard sites with apple only. Therefore, standardization of suitable agro- techniques to combat the replant problem in apple for better field survival rate and productivity under replant conditions for the sustainability of the apple industry in the state and another part of the country is necessary. The present investigation was carried out using 20 soil agro-techniques combinations, comprising of four apple rootstocks viz., seedling, Merton 793, MM.111 and M.7 and five different soil agro-techniques namely soil fumigation, PGPR, biocontrol, combined (Soil fumigation + PGPR + Biocontrol) and control with three replications. The data revealed that Merton 793 rootstock improved the plant growth and vigour parameters, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial counts. Among the soil agro-techniques, the similar results were recorded in case of combined soil agro-technique. The interaction between rootstocks and soil agro-techniques revealed that combinations of Merton 793 x combined technique excelled in respect for growth and vigour traits, soil enzymatic activities and bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes counts over other combinations under replant situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merton 793 rootstock improved plant growth and vigour in replanted apple.

Treatment
Merton 793 rootstocke0
Outcome
plant growth and vigour parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of apple replant diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data revealed that Merton 793 rootstock improved the plant growth and vigour parameters, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merton 793 rootstock improved soil enzymatic activities in replanted apple sites.

Treatment
Merton 793 rootstocke0
Outcome
soil enzymatic activitiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of apple replant diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data revealed that Merton 793 rootstock improved the plant growth and vigour parameters, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merton 793 rootstock improved soil microbial counts in replanted apple sites.

Treatment
Merton 793 rootstocke0
Outcome
microbial countse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of apple replant diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data revealed that Merton 793 rootstock improved the plant growth and vigour parameters, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merton 793 combined with the combined soil agro-technique excelled over other combinations in growth, soil enzyme activities and microbial counts.

Treatment
Merton 793 x combined techniquee2
Outcome
growth and vigour traits, soil enzymatic activities and bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes countse2
Direction
excellede2
Comparator
other combinationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of apple replant diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“combinations of Merton 793 x combined technique excelled in respect for growth and vigour traits, soil enzymatic activities and bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes counts over other combinations under replant situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil agro-technique gave similar results across rootstocks.

Treatment
combined soil agro-techniquee1
Outcome
similar resultse1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of apple replant diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the soil agro-techniques, the similar results were recorded in case of combined soil agro-technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1216 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

grafting · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.