Paper · 2022 · JSFA reports

Storage duration and conditions change the phytate content and phytase activity of wheat grains

Margit Schollenberger; Vera Sommerfeld; Jens Hartung; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background The degree to which storage conditions and duration affect phytase activity and inositol phosphates (InsP) was evaluated in wheat. Three wheat cultivars were stored as whole or ground kernels at 20, 7, and −18°C for 13, 48, 118, 188, 265, and 349 days. Samples were analyzed for InsP 3‐6 concentration and phytase activity. Results The InsP 6 concentration of whole wheat kernels stored at −18 and 7°C did not differ from that at time point 0. Storage of whole kernels at 20°C significantly reduced the InsP 6 concentration at days 48, 188, 265, and 349, by up to 8.4%. The InsP 6 concentration of ground wheat samples was reduced by up to 23.6% until day 349. The lower InsP isomers Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P 5 and Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P 5 were detected only at a storage temperature of 20°C and at day 118 or later. Phytase activity did not change over time in ground kernels stored at −18 and +7°C but was decreased in ground kernels at 20°C and in whole kernels independent of temperature. Probable cultivar effects were found regarding phytase activity over time, dependent on grinding and storage temperature. Conclusion To avoid loss of InsP 6 content, wheat samples should be stored as whole kernels at or below 7°C. Phytase activity is more stable in ground samples than in whole kernels. However, some cultivars likely are more prone than others to storage effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytate (InsP 6) concentration of whole kernels stored at −18 and 7°C did not differ from time point 0.

Organ / stage
whole wheat kernelse1
Treatment
stored at −18 and 7°Ce1
Outcome
InsP 6 concentratione1
Direction
did not differe1
Comparator
time point 0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The InsP 6 concentration of whole wheat kernels stored at −18 and 7°C did not differ from that at time point 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storing whole kernels at 20°C significantly reduced InsP 6 concentration by up to 8.4% at days 48 to 349.

Organ / stage
whole kernelse1
Treatment
Storage of whole kernels at 20°Ce1
Outcome
InsP 6 concentratione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
8.4%e1
Qualifier
at days 48, 188, 265, and 349e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Storage of whole kernels at 20°C significantly reduced the InsP 6 concentration at days 48, 188, 265, and 349, by up to 8.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

InsP 6 concentration of ground wheat samples was reduced by up to 23.6% until day 349.

Organ / stage
ground wheat samplese1
Outcome
InsP 6 concentratione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
23.6%e1
Qualifier
until day 349e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The InsP 6 concentration of ground wheat samples was reduced by up to 23.6% until day 349”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower InsP isomers were detected only at 20°C and from day 118 or later.

Treatment
a storage temperature of 20°Ce1
Outcome
lower InsP isomerse1
Qualifier
at day 118 or latere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The lower InsP isomers Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P 5 and Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P 5 were detected only at a storage temperature of 20°C and at day 118 or later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytase activity in ground kernels did not change over time at −18 and +7°C.

Organ / stage
ground kernelse1
Treatment
stored at −18 and +7°Ce1
Outcome
Phytase activitye1
Direction
did not changee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phytase activity did not change over time in ground kernels stored at −18 and +7°C but was decreased in ground kernels at 20°C and in whole kernels independent of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytase activity was decreased in ground kernels stored at 20°C.

Organ / stage
ground kernelse1
Treatment
at 20°Ce1
Outcome
Phytase activitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phytase activity did not change over time in ground kernels stored at −18 and +7°C but was decreased in ground kernels at 20°C and in whole kernels independent of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytase activity was decreased in whole kernels independent of storage temperature.

Organ / stage
whole kernelse1
Treatment
independent of temperaturee1
Outcome
Phytase activitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phytase activity did not change over time in ground kernels stored at −18 and +7°C but was decreased in ground kernels at 20°C and in whole kernels independent of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probable cultivar effects on phytase activity over time depend on grinding and storage temperature.

Material
cultivare1
Treatment
grinding and storage temperaturee1
Outcome
phytase activity over timee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Probable cultivar effects were found regarding phytase activity over time, dependent on grinding and storage temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytase activity is more stable in ground samples than in whole kernels.

Treatment
ground samplese1
Outcome
Phytase activitye1
Direction
more stablee1
Comparator
whole kernelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phytase activity is more stable in ground samples than in whole kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To avoid loss of InsP 6 content, wheat samples should be stored as whole kernels at or below 7°C.

Treatment
stored as whole kernels at or below 7°Ce1
Outcome
loss of InsP 6 contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“To avoid loss of InsP 6 content, wheat samples should be stored as whole kernels at or below 7°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1226 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some cultivars are likely more prone than others to storage effects.

Material
some cultivarse1
Outcome
storage effectse1
Direction
more pronee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“some cultivars likely are more prone than others to storage effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“phytase activity of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–95 · show in text ↑

storage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.