Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal

Does winter cereal rye seeding rate, termination time, and N rate impact no‐till soybean?

Heidi K. Reed; Heather D. Karsten

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Some farmers who use cover crops (CCs) have moved from CC preplant kill (PK) to delayed CC termination, called planting green (PG). We conducted a study to explore if soil conditions and crop production can be optimized by manipulating winter cereal rye ( Secale cereal L.) seeding rate and spring N topdress rate for these two termination times. Treatments were arranged in a split‐split plot, randomized complete block design with four replications for three years at two Pennsylvania locations. Main plots were seeding rate (34, 67, and 134 kg ha −1 , or 1x, 2x, and 4x, respectively), subplots were termination timing (PK and PG), and sub‐subplots were N rate (34 and 67 kg ha −1 , or low and high, respectively). Planting green nearly doubled rye biomass at both sites, and at Landisville the high N rate accumulated 17% more biomass than the low N rate, while there was no biomass N rate effect in PK. Soil in PG was 7–15% drier at planting, up to 7% wetter later, and up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler compared with PK at both sites. Soybean ( Glycine max L.) yield was reduced by 3–4% when PG was paired with the high N rate across seeding rates at Rock Springs and with the 1x seeding rate at Landisville compared with other treatment combinations. Soybean population was not impacted by treatments. We conclude rye seeding and N topdress rates of 34 kg ha −1 in PG can maintain similar conditions and soybean yield equivalent to PK, thereby reducing seed and N costs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting green nearly doubled rye biomass at both sites.

Treatment
Planting greene0
Outcome
rye biomasse0
Direction
doublede0
Value
nearly doublede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting green nearly doubled rye biomass at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Landisville high nitrogen raised rye biomass accumulation by 17% versus low nitrogen.

Treatment
high N ratee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
low N ratee0
Setting
Landisvillee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Landisville the high N rate accumulated 17% more biomass than the low N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In preplant kill, nitrogen rate did not affect biomass.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
no biomass N rate effecte0
Qualifier
PKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no biomass N rate effect in PK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting green soil was 7–15% drier at planting than preplant kill soil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
Soile0
Direction
driere0
Value
7–15%e0
Qualifier
at plantinge0
Comparator
PKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil in PG was 7–15% drier at planting, up to 7% wetter later, and up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler compared with PK at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting green soil was up to 7% wetter later than preplant kill soil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
Soile0
Direction
wettere0
Value
up to 7%e0
Qualifier
latere0
Comparator
PKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil in PG was 7–15% drier at planting, up to 7% wetter later, and up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler compared with PK at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting green soil was up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler than preplant kill soil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
Soile0
Direction
coolere0
Value
0.9–1.3 °Ce0
Comparator
PKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil in PG was 7–15% drier at planting, up to 7% wetter later, and up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler compared with PK at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Rock Springs, planting green with high nitrogen reduced soybean yield 3–4% versus other combinations.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
PG was paired with the high N ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3–4%e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Rock Springse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean ( Glycine max L.) yield was reduced by 3–4% when PG was paired with the high N rate across seeding rates at Rock Springs and with the 1x seeding rate at Landisville compared with other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Landisville, planting green with 1x rye seeding reduced soybean yield 3–4% versus other combinations.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3–4%e0
Qualifier
1x seeding ratee0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Landisvillee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean ( Glycine max L.) yield was reduced by 3–4% when PG was paired with the high N rate across seeding rates at Rock Springs and with the 1x seeding rate at Landisville compared with other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect soybean population.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
not impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean population was not impacted by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1306 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 34 kg ha −1 rye seeding and nitrogen topdress in planting green to maintain soybean yield equivalent to preplant kill.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
rye seeding and N topdress rates of 34 kg ha −1 in PGe0
Outcome
soybean yield equivalent to PKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We conclude rye seeding and N topdress rates of 34 kg ha −1 in PG can maintain similar conditions and soybean yield equivalent to PK, thereby reducing seed and N costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Results differ

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

416 papers: 318 positive, 98 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 318 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

412 papers more in this group

See all 416 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.