Paper · 2022 · Horticulturae

Alternative Control of Tomato Wilt Using the Aqueous Extract of Calotropis procera

Kamal A. M. Abo-Elyousr; Esmat F. Ali; Nashwa M. A. Sallam

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand (commonly known as the apple of sodom, calotrope, and giant milkweed) is an evergreen, perennial shrub of the Apocynaceae family, and is mainly found in arid and semi-arid regions. Previous studies have established the toxic effects of Calotropis procera (C. procera) (Aiton). Its extract is used as one of the vital alternatives to pesticides due to its effective impacts on several pathogens and to combat insect pests that cause severe damage to several crops, but so far, its effects on combating Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL) have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, the current study focuses on evaluating the effects of the aqueous extract of this plant on FOL by studying physicochemical indicators. In Saudi Arabia and many other countries, such disease is considered as one of the critical factors affecting tomato growth and production. For the control of Fusarium wilt disease (Fwd), many strategies have been developed, but are limited in their use. Ten isolates of the pathogens were obtained from diseased tomato plants. These isolates were able to exhibit symptoms of tomato wilt, and they varied in their virulence. Isolate No. 5 caused the highest severity of the disease (73%). According to these results, we used this isolate in the following experiment, which was identified by ITS sequences as F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Following intensive screening studies, we selected aqueous plant extract of C. procera to study its effectiveness against Fwd of tomato plants and their antifungal activity or induce systemic resistance in plants. All concentrations of C. procera extracts suppressed growth of the pathogen. The highest reduction of mycelia growth was obtained by aqueous extract at 15%, it reduced the pathogen growth to 70.2%, relative to the control. In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively). The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively). Total phenols and flavonoids as well as antioxidant enzymes were increased in inoculated or non-inoculated tomato plants after being treated with aqueous extracts of C. procera.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% aqueous extract reduced Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici growth to 70.2% of the control.

Treatment
aqueous extract at 15%e2
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen growthe2
Direction
reducede2
Value
70.2%e2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest reduction of mycelia growth was obtained by aqueous extract at 15%, it reduced the pathogen growth to 70.2%, relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1831 · show in text ↑
e3

“In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All concentrations of C. procera extract suppressed growth of the pathogen.

Treatment
C. procera extractse7
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the pathogene7
Direction
suppressede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e3

“In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2020 · show in text ↑
e7

“All concentrations of C. procera extracts suppressed growth of the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 5% significantly reduced Fusarium wilt disease of tomato by 52.01% compared with the infected control.

Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e3
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
Fwde3
Direction
significantly reducede3
Value
52.01e3
Comparator
infected controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e3

“In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 10% significantly reduced Fusarium wilt disease of tomato by 69.86% compared with the infected control.

Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e3
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
Fwde3
Direction
significantly reducede3
Value
69.86e3
Comparator
infected controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e3

“In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 15% significantly reduced Fusarium wilt disease of tomato by 83.6% compared with the infected control.

Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e3
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
Fwde3
Direction
significantly reducede3
Value
83.6%e3
Comparator
infected controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e3

“In greenhouse conditions, the aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly reduced Fwd of the tomato compared to the infected control (52.01, 69.86, and 83.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 5% significantly enhanced tomato fresh weight (50) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
fresh weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
50e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 10% significantly enhanced tomato fresh weight (66.6) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
fresh weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
66.6e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 15% significantly enhanced tomato fresh weight (86.6) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
fresh weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
86.6e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 5% significantly enhanced tomato dry weight (60%) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
dry weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
60e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 10% significantly enhanced tomato dry weight (100%) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
dry weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
100e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 15% significantly enhanced tomato dry weight (120%) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
dry weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
120%e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant enzymes increased in tomato plants treated with aqueous C. procera extracts.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume6
Treatment
aqueous extracts of C. procerae6
Outcome
Total phenols and flavonoids as well as antioxidant enzymese6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Total phenols and flavonoids as well as antioxidant enzymes were increased in inoculated or non-inoculated tomato plants after being treated with aqueous extracts of C. procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2277–2453 · show in text ↑

Calotropis procera · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.