Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 5% significantly enhanced tomato fresh weight (50) compared with inoculated plants.

A claim from Alternative Control of Tomato Wilt Using the Aqueous Extract of Calotropis procera · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous C. procera extract at 5% significantly enhanced tomato fresh weight (50) compared with inoculated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment
aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15%e4
Outcome
fresh weighte4
Direction
significantly enhancede4
Value
50e4
Comparator
inoculated plantse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The use of aqueous C. procera extract at 5, 10, and 15% significantly enhanced the fresh and dry weight of tomato plants (g plant−1) compared to inoculated plants (for fresh weight: 50, 66.6, and 86.6 and for dry weight: 60, 100, and 120%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2275

Title

Alternative Control of Tomato Wilt Using the Aqueous Extract of Calotropis procera

Kamal A. M. Abo-Elyousr; Esmat F. Ali; Nashwa M. A. Sallam Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8030197

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a5ca731cda5c021e4d85da9768c1522d736d6da70277c45b132e19e3ab4ee4e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Calotropis procera · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.