Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Production Efficiency, Water Productivity and Monetary Efficiency of Okra Under Organic Manure and Biofertilzers Application

Jitendra Singh Bamboriya; S. R. Naga; Sumitra Devi Bamboriya; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 2017 at Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner (Jaipur) to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra. The study had four organic manures and four biofertilizer treatments that were replicated thrice in factorial randomized block design. Vermicompost application @ 6 t ha-1 resulted into the maximum production efficiency (201 kg ha-1day-1) and water productivity (54 kg ha-1mm-1) whereas poultry manure (@ 8 t ha-1) reported greatest monetary efficiency (Rs. 3013 ha-1day-1). Among the biofertilizers, dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSB recorded 39%, 40% and 55% higher production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency than control. Fourth picking yielded the greatest tonnes of fruit and yield declines after it. Application of organic manures and biofertilizer enhanced okra yield up to 5.9 and 3.8 t ha-1, respectively. Therefore, poultry manure and double inoculation with biofertilizer is advisable for okra production under poorly fertile soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 6 t ha-1 gave the maximum production efficiency of okra.

Treatment
Vermicompost application @ 6 t ha-1e1
Outcome
production efficiencye1
Direction
maximume1
Value
201 kg ha-1day-1e1
Setting
Jobner (Jaipur)e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 2017 at Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner (Jaipur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vermicompost application @ 6 t ha-1 resulted into the maximum production efficiency (201 kg ha-1day-1) and water productivity (54 kg ha-1mm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 6 t ha-1 gave the maximum water productivity of okra.

Treatment
Vermicompost application @ 6 t ha-1e1
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
maximume1
Value
54 kg ha-1mm-1e1
Setting
Jobner (Jaipur)e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 2017 at Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner (Jaipur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vermicompost application @ 6 t ha-1 resulted into the maximum production efficiency (201 kg ha-1day-1) and water productivity (54 kg ha-1mm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 8 t ha-1 gave the greatest monetary efficiency of okra.

Treatment
poultry manure (@ 8 t ha-1)e2
Outcome
monetary efficiencye2
Direction
greateste2
Value
Rs. 3013 ha-1day-1e2
Setting
Jobner (Jaipur)e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 2017 at Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner (Jaipur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e2

“poultry manure (@ 8 t ha-1) reported greatest monetary efficiency (Rs. 3013 ha-1day-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual seed treatment with Azosprillum + PSB raised production efficiency of okra by 39% over control.

Treatment
dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSBe3
Outcome
production efficiencye3
Direction
highere3
Value
39%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e3

“dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSB recorded 39%, 40% and 55% higher production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual seed treatment with Azosprillum + PSB raised water productivity of okra by 40% over control.

Treatment
dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSBe3
Outcome
water productivitye3
Direction
highere3
Value
40%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e3

“dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSB recorded 39%, 40% and 55% higher production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual seed treatment with Azosprillum + PSB raised monetary efficiency of okra by 55% over control.

Treatment
dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSBe3
Outcome
monetary efficiencye3
Direction
highere3
Value
55%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e3

“dual seed treatment with both Azosprillum + PSB recorded 39%, 40% and 55% higher production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourth picking gave the greatest tonnes of okra fruit.

Treatment
Fourth pickinge4
Outcome
tonnes of fruite4
Direction
greateste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fourth picking yielded the greatest tonnes of fruit and yield declines after it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra yield declined after the fourth picking.

Outcome
yield declines after ite4
Qualifier
Fourth pickinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fourth picking yielded the greatest tonnes of fruit and yield declines after it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures enhanced okra yield by up to 5.9 t ha-1.

Treatment
organic manurese5
Outcome
okra yielde5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
5.9e5
Qualifier
up toe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of organic manures and biofertilizer enhanced okra yield up to 5.9 and 3.8 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer enhanced okra yield by up to 3.8 t ha-1.

Treatment
biofertilizere5
Outcome
okra yielde5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
3.8e5
Qualifier
up toe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the effect of biofertilizers and organic manures on production efficiency, water productivity and monetary efficiency of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–262 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of organic manures and biofertilizer enhanced okra yield up to 5.9 and 3.8 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1013 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure with double biofertilizer inoculation is advisable for okra production on poorly fertile soils.

Outcome
poultry manure and double inoculation with biofertilizere6
Setting
poorly fertile soilse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“poultry manure and double inoculation with biofertilizer is advisable for okra production under poorly fertile soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1142 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.