Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Dry Spells on Growth and Yield of Wheat Under Irrigated Condition

Abhishika Sonal John N. Kumar; A. K. Thakur P. K. Salam; T. Chandrakar D. P. Singh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in Rabi 2020 at the Instructional cum Research Farm, Shaheed Gundadhoor College of Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh to study the effect of dry spells on growth and yield of wheat under irrigated condition. The experiment was laid on Randomized Complete Block Design (RBD) with replicated 4 times and involved 5 treatments i.e., T1 (25 days dry spell at 45 days after sowing), T2 (20 days dry spell after flower initiation), T3 (20 days dry spell after 50% flowering), T4 (Irrigation at 30% moisture in soil) and T5 (Control) were applied. Dry spells significantly decreased the plant height, panicle length, number of panicles plant-1, test weight, grain yield and harvest index. Maximum reduction of all these parameters were recorded in treatment T5 (Control). However, there was no significant effect of dry spells on the number of seeds panicle-1. It was concluded that treatment T4 with irrigation at 30% moisture in soil performed better and gave higher yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry spells significantly reduced wheat plant height.

Treatment
Dry spellse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry spells significantly decreased the plant height, panicle length, number of panicles plant-1, test weight, grain yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry spells significantly reduced panicle length and number of panicles per plant.

Treatment
Dry spellse0
Outcome
panicle length, number of panicles plant-1e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry spells significantly decreased the plant height, panicle length, number of panicles plant-1, test weight, grain yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry spells significantly reduced test weight, grain yield and harvest index.

Treatment
Dry spellse0
Outcome
test weight, grain yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry spells significantly decreased the plant height, panicle length, number of panicles plant-1, test weight, grain yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract reports maximum reductions of the listed traits in T5, labeled the control.

Treatment
treatment T5 (Control)e0
Outcome
reduction of all these parameterse0
Direction
Maximum reductione0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reduction of all these parameters were recorded in treatment T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry spells had no statistically significant effect on seeds per panicle.

Treatment
dry spellse0
Outcome
number of seeds panicle-1e0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect of dry spells on the number of seeds panicle-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 irrigation at 30% soil moisture gave higher yield.

Treatment
irrigation at 30% moisture in soile0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T4 with irrigation at 30% moisture in soil performed better and gave higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Under Irrigated Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–75 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.