Paper · 2022 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Sorghum seed coating with zinc: Physiological quality and initial performance of plants

Vanessa Aparecida Pereira Batista; Henrique Duarte Vieira; José Inácio Coelho Pires; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is highly sensitive to zinc deficiency in soils, which results in decreased productivity and low-quality agricultural products. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of different zinc doses, applied to seeds, on the physiological quality and initial performance of sorghum plants. Six doses (0, 3.5, 7.0, 14.0, 21.0, and 28.0 g kg-1 seeds) were used and an uncoated control. The Zn coating process used dolomitic limestone as the filler and glue. Laboratory tests were conducted in a completely randomized design and greenhouse experiments were conducted in a randomized block design. The control means were 8, 9, and 14% lower than the maximum, minimum, and total seed area of treatments, respectively, relative to that of treatments. The control differed from other treatments by 10.47 in the speed index of emergence. Zinc at a dose of 28 g kg-1 seeds provided greater production of aerial dry matter, with nutrient content of 75.85 mg kg-1. Zinc on sorghum seeds affected length and dry matter production of aerial parts and roots but did not affect physical characteristics, germination, or emergence time. Applied zinc accumulated mainly in the roots, and promotes changes in Ca and Mg in seeds and other plant parts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncoated control sorghum seeds had 8% lower maximum seed area than coated treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
maximume1
Direction
lowere1
Value
8e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control means were 8, 9, and 14% lower than the maximum, minimum, and total seed area of treatments, respectively, relative to that of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncoated control sorghum seeds had 9% lower minimum seed area than coated treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
minimume1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control means were 8, 9, and 14% lower than the maximum, minimum, and total seed area of treatments, respectively, relative to that of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncoated control sorghum seeds had 14% lower total seed area than coated treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
total seed areae1
Direction
lowere1
Value
14%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control means were 8, 9, and 14% lower than the maximum, minimum, and total seed area of treatments, respectively, relative to that of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The emergence speed index differed by 10.47 between control and zinc-coated sorghum seed treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
other treatmentse1
Outcome
speed index of emergencee1
Value
10.47e1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control differed from other treatments by 10.47 in the speed index of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A zinc dose of 28 g kg-1 seeds gave greater aerial dry matter production in sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Zinc at a dose of 28 g kg-1 seedse1
Outcome
production of aerial dry mattere1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc at a dose of 28 g kg-1 seeds provided greater production of aerial dry matter, with nutrient content of 75.85 mg kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum aerial tissue under 28 g kg-1 seed zinc had nutrient content of 75.85 mg kg-1.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Zinc at a dose of 28 g kg-1 seedse1
Outcome
nutrient contente1
Value
75.85 mg kg-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc at a dose of 28 g kg-1 seeds provided greater production of aerial dry matter, with nutrient content of 75.85 mg kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed coating affected sorghum aerial and root length and dry matter production.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Zinc on sorghum seedse1
Outcome
length and dry matter production of aerial parts and rootse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc on sorghum seeds affected length and dry matter production of aerial parts and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed coating did not affect sorghum seed physical characteristics, germination, or emergence time.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Zinc on sorghum seedse0
Outcome
physical characteristics, germination, or emergence timee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc on sorghum seeds affected length and dry matter production of aerial parts and roots but did not affect physical characteristics, germination, or emergence time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied zinc accumulated mainly in sorghum roots.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Applied zince1
Outcome
zinc accumulated mainly in the rootse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied zinc accumulated mainly in the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied zinc changed calcium content in sorghum seeds and other plant parts.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
seeds and other plant partse1
Treatment
Applied zince1
Outcome
Cae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied zinc accumulated mainly in the roots, and promotes changes in Ca and Mg in seeds and other plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied zinc changed magnesium content in sorghum seeds and other plant parts.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
seeds and other plant partse1
Treatment
Applied zince1
Outcome
Mge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied zinc accumulated mainly in the roots, and promotes changes in Ca and Mg in seeds and other plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1252 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · SorghumResults differ

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.