Abstract
Microarray technology has allowed the large scale transcriptomic analysis of fruit ripening and the PEACH1.0 microarray containing 4,806 probes corresponding to genes expressed in peach fruit tissues has been used in a heterologous fashion in two studies of the ripening behaviour of plums. Gene expression of different cultivars of plums treated with the ethylene antagonist, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and stored for short periods at room temperature or for longer periods of cold storage was examined. In the first study, mature fruit of a suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Shiro and a cv. characterized by a typical increase of ethylene production during ripening (Santa Rosa) were harvested and incubated for 24 h in air (control) or 1-MCP. The fruit were allowed to ripen at room temperature for up to 8 days. Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified. In the second study, the effects of 1-MCP on gene expression in relation to the development of chilling injury (CI) in the suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR) and the climacteric cv. October Sun (OS) were followed. The fruit were treated for 24 h at room temperature with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C. For RR, there was no significant effect of 1-MCP on the level of chilling injury while for as 1-MCP significantly reduced CI. Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively: after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit. Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR. Comparisons of the data with those obtained from peaches and nectarines suggest that transcript profile is more altered by 1-MCP in plums than peaches. These studies, carried out within an international collaborative network, will increase our understanding of the regulation of pathways involved in plum fruit ripening and in metabolic processes related to storage and shelf life.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Transcript levels of genes in cell wall metabolism, hormone regulation, stress and defense differed in plum fruit.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Outcome
- transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defensee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e1“Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified”
Claim · model-written summary
Transcript levels of genes in the transcription/translation machinery and other ripening-related genes differed in plum fruit.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Outcome
- transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripeninge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e1“Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified”
Claim · model-written summary
For cultivar Ruby Red, 1-MCP had no significant effect on the level of chilling injury.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- Ruby Rede2
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe1
- Outcome
- level of chilling injurye1
- Direction
- no significant effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e1“For RR, there was no significant effect of 1-MCP on the level of chilling injury”
e2“suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR)”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP significantly reduced chilling injury in the cultivar that the abstract garbles as "as".
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 1-MCPe3
- Outcome
- CIe3
- Direction
- significantly reducede3
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e3“while for as 1-MCP significantly reduced CI”
Claim · model-written summary
Immediately after 1-MCP treatment, 186 genes were differentially expressed in Ruby Red fruit compared with control.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- Ruby Rede2
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe4
- Outcome
- genese4
- Direction
- differentially expressede4
- Value
- 186e4
- Qualifier
- immediately following treatmente4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e4“Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively”
e2“suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR)”
Claim · model-written summary
Immediately after 1-MCP treatment, 134 genes were differentially expressed in October Sun fruit compared with control.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- October Sune5
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe4
- Outcome
- genese4
- Direction
- differentially expressede4
- Value
- 134e4
- Qualifier
- immediately following treatmente4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e4“Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively”
e5“the climacteric cv. October Sun (OS)”
Claim · model-written summary
After 4 weeks cold storage, 311 genes were differentially expressed in RR fruit treated with 1-MCP compared with control.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- RRe6
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe7
- Outcome
- genese6
- Direction
- differentially expressede6
- Value
- 311e6
- Qualifier
- after 4 weeks cold storagee6
- Comparator
- controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e6“after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit”
e7“with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C”
Claim · model-written summary
After 4 weeks cold storage, 52 genes were differentially expressed in OS fruit treated with 1-MCP compared with control.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- OSe6
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe7
- Outcome
- genese6
- Direction
- differentially expressede6
- Value
- 52e6
- Qualifier
- after 4 weeks cold storagee6
- Comparator
- controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e6“after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit”
e7“with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C”
Claim · model-written summary
For OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- OSe5
- Outcome
- number of differentially expressed genese5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Qualifier
- during storagee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e5“Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR”
Claim · model-written summary
For RR, the number of differentially expressed genes increased.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Material
- RRe5
- Outcome
- number of differentially expressed genese5
- Direction
- increasede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”
e5“Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with peach data, 1-MCP altered the transcript profile more in plums.
- Taxon
- plums
Prunus domesticae6 - Treatment
- 1-MCPe6
- Outcome
- transcript profilee6
- Direction
- more alterede6
- Comparator
- peachese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Comparisons of the data with those obtained from peaches and nectarines suggest that transcript profile is more altered by 1-MCP in plums than peaches”
The same questions in other papers
1-methylcyclopropene · crop injury · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.