Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

COMPARATIVE TRANSCRIPTOMIC ANALYSIS OF PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP

G.A. Manganaris; A. Jajo; P. Holford; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Microarray technology has allowed the large scale transcriptomic analysis of fruit ripening and the PEACH1.0 microarray containing 4,806 probes corresponding to genes expressed in peach fruit tissues has been used in a heterologous fashion in two studies of the ripening behaviour of plums. Gene expression of different cultivars of plums treated with the ethylene antagonist, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and stored for short periods at room temperature or for longer periods of cold storage was examined. In the first study, mature fruit of a suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Shiro and a cv. characterized by a typical increase of ethylene production during ripening (Santa Rosa) were harvested and incubated for 24 h in air (control) or 1-MCP. The fruit were allowed to ripen at room temperature for up to 8 days. Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified. In the second study, the effects of 1-MCP on gene expression in relation to the development of chilling injury (CI) in the suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR) and the climacteric cv. October Sun (OS) were followed. The fruit were treated for 24 h at room temperature with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C. For RR, there was no significant effect of 1-MCP on the level of chilling injury while for as 1-MCP significantly reduced CI. Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively: after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit. Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR. Comparisons of the data with those obtained from peaches and nectarines suggest that transcript profile is more altered by 1-MCP in plums than peaches. These studies, carried out within an international collaborative network, will increase our understanding of the regulation of pathways involved in plum fruit ripening and in metabolic processes related to storage and shelf life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcript levels of genes in cell wall metabolism, hormone regulation, stress and defense differed in plum fruit.

Outcome
transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defensee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1062 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcript levels of genes in the transcription/translation machinery and other ripening-related genes differed in plum fruit.

Outcome
transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripeninge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different levels of transcripts of genes implicated in cell wall metabolism, hormone (ethylene and auxin) regulation, stress and defense, and in the transcription/translation machinery, as well as others involved with ripening were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For cultivar Ruby Red, 1-MCP had no significant effect on the level of chilling injury.

Material
Ruby Rede2
Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
level of chilling injurye1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“For RR, there was no significant effect of 1-MCP on the level of chilling injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1460 · show in text ↑
e2

“suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP significantly reduced chilling injury in the cultivar that the abstract garbles as "as".

Treatment
1-MCPe3
Outcome
CIe3
Direction
significantly reducede3

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“while for as 1-MCP significantly reduced CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immediately after 1-MCP treatment, 186 genes were differentially expressed in Ruby Red fruit compared with control.

Material
Ruby Rede2
Treatment
1-MCPe4
Outcome
genese4
Direction
differentially expressede4
Value
186e4
Qualifier
immediately following treatmente4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1690 · show in text ↑
e2

“suppressed ethylene climacteric cv. Ruby Red (RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immediately after 1-MCP treatment, 134 genes were differentially expressed in October Sun fruit compared with control.

Material
October Sune5
Treatment
1-MCPe4
Outcome
genese4
Direction
differentially expressede4
Value
134e4
Qualifier
immediately following treatmente4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“Microarray analysis showed that immediately following treatment, 186 and 134 genes were differentially expressed between the control and 1-MCP-treated fruit of these cvv., respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1690 · show in text ↑
e5

“the climacteric cv. October Sun (OS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 weeks cold storage, 311 genes were differentially expressed in RR fruit treated with 1-MCP compared with control.

Material
RRe6
Treatment
1-MCPe7
Outcome
genese6
Direction
differentially expressede6
Value
311e6
Qualifier
after 4 weeks cold storagee6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1829 · show in text ↑
e7

“with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 weeks cold storage, 52 genes were differentially expressed in OS fruit treated with 1-MCP compared with control.

Material
OSe6
Treatment
1-MCPe7
Outcome
genese6
Direction
differentially expressede6
Value
52e6
Qualifier
after 4 weeks cold storagee6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“after 4 weeks cold storage, 311 and 52 genes for RR and OS, respectively, were differentially expressed between control and treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1829 · show in text ↑
e7

“with 1-MCP prior to storage at 0C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1378 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage.

Material
OSe5
Outcome
number of differentially expressed genese5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
during storagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1945 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For RR, the number of differentially expressed genes increased.

Material
RRe5
Outcome
number of differentially expressed genese5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PLUM FRUIT TREATED WITH 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Thus, for OS, the number of differentially expressed genes reduced during storage while the number increased in RR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with peach data, 1-MCP altered the transcript profile more in plums.

Treatment
1-MCPe6
Outcome
transcript profilee6
Direction
more alterede6
Comparator
peachese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Comparisons of the data with those obtained from peaches and nectarines suggest that transcript profile is more altered by 1-MCP in plums than peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2097 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · crop injury · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.