Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Influence of 1-MCP on compression injury, fruit firmness and quality of Japanese plum cv. Santa Rosa during transportation

Swati Sharma; R.R. Sharma; R.K. Pal; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plum is a very delicate fruit and requires massive post-harvest managements for enhancing its shelf-life so as to make it available in the market for longer time. Thus, studies were conducted to observe the effect of 1-MCP treatment on Santa Rosa plums of two maturity groups (climacteric and pre-climacteric) during transportation. Plums of both maturity stages were subjected to 1-MCP treatments (control, 1- MCP @ 0.5 μl l−1, 1-MCP @ 1.0 μl l−1, 1-MCP @ 1.5 μl l−1 and Celfresh® tablet) for 24 h at 20°C, then packed in CFB boxes and transported to Delhi by road. After transportation, observations were recorded on several parameters. Our results revealed that untreated plums have very heavy loss during transportation due to compression injury in both stages of maturity (25.0 and 9.0%) being quite higher in climacteric stage than pre-climacteric stage. All 1-MCP treatments had significantly reduced compression injury, being the least (0.0) in 1-MCP (1.5 μl l−1) and Celfresh® tablets. There was significant loss in quality parameters like fruit firmness, AOX capacity, TSS, acidity and ascorbic acid in untreated plums but was maintained quite appreciably by 1-MCP, especially by Celfresh® tablets. Similarly, respiration and ethylene evolution rates were higher in untreated plums than those, which were treated with different concentrations of 1-MCP, being the least in Celfresh® tablet treated fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated climacteric plums had 25.0% compression injury during transport.

Organ / stage
climacteric stagee0e1
Outcome
compression injurye0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Value
25.0e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compression injury in both stages of maturity (25.0 and 9.0%) being quite higher in climacteric stage than pre-climacteric stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results revealed that untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated pre-climacteric plums had 9.0% compression injury during transport.

Organ / stage
pre-climacteric stagee0e1
Outcome
compression injurye0e1
Value
9.0%e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compression injury in both stages of maturity (25.0 and 9.0%) being quite higher in climacteric stage than pre-climacteric stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results revealed that untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All 1-MCP treatments significantly reduced compression injury.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmentse0e1
Outcome
compression injurye0e1
Direction
reducede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All 1-MCP treatments had significantly reduced compression injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results revealed that untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1-MCP 1.5 μl l−1 treatment gave the least compression injury, 0.0.

Treatment
1-MCP (1.5 μl l−1)e0e1e2
Outcome
compression injurye0e1e2
Direction
leaste0e1e2
Value
0.0e0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being the least (0.0) in 1-MCP (1.5 μl l−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to compression injury in both stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results revealed that untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Celfresh tablets gave the least compression injury, 0.0.

Treatment
Celfresh® tabletse0e1e2
Outcome
compression injurye0e1e2
Direction
leaste0e1e2
Value
0.0e0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being the least (0.0) in 1-MCP (1.5 μl l−1) and Celfresh® tablets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to compression injury in both stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results revealed that untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP maintained firmness, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solids during transport.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruit firmness, AOX capacity, TSSe0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
untreated plumse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness, AOX capacity, TSS, acidity and ascorbic acid in untreated plums but was maintained quite appreciably by 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP maintained acidity and ascorbic acid during transport.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
acidity and ascorbic acide0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
untreated plumse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness, AOX capacity, TSS, acidity and ascorbic acid in untreated plums but was maintained quite appreciably by 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plums had higher respiration than 1-MCP treated plums.

Treatment
different concentrations of 1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plumse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“respiration and ethylene evolution rates were higher in untreated plums than those, which were treated with different concentrations of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plums had higher ethylene evolution than 1-MCP treated plums.

Treatment
different concentrations of 1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene evolution ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plumse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“respiration and ethylene evolution rates were higher in untreated plums than those, which were treated with different concentrations of 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Celfresh tablets gave the lowest respiration and ethylene evolution rates.

Treatment
Celfresh® tablete0e1
Outcome
respiration and ethylene evolution ratese0e1
Direction
leaste0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being the least in Celfresh® tablet treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“respiration and ethylene evolution rates were higher in untreated plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1291 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Prunus domestica (plum)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Prunus domestica (plum)Results differ

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · crop injury · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.