Paper · 2022 · Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi

Response of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to Planting Rate and Row Spacing in a High Altitude Enviroment

Fırat SEFAOĞLU; Hakan ÖZER

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), has the potential to be an important oilseed crop in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. In this region with a semi-arid climate, there is no scientific study about row spacing and planting rate in safflower. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of row spacing and planting rate on yield and agronomic properties of safflower cultivars (Dinçer and Yenice) in dry conditions, in the years 2013 and 2014. Three different row spacings (20, 40 and 60 cm) and planting rates (20, 40 and 60 kg ha-1) were tested. In both study years, it was determined that seeding rate, row spacing and cultivars have significant effects on plant growth, yield and yield components. The cultivars responded similarly to both treatments that row spacing and planting norm in terms of seed yield in both research years. It was determined that the examined plant characters were significantly affected by the treatments, and the oil concentration, seed, and oil yield increased with increased row spacing and planting rate. The results obtained from this study emphasize the importance of the choice of suitable row spacing and planting rate in safflower production in semi-arid environments and the seed yield in safflower could be increased by narrow plantings (i.e.the 20 and 40 cm row spacings with 60 kg ha-1planting rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate, row spacing and cultivars significantly affected plant growth, yield and yield components of safflower in both years.

Taxon
Carthamus tinctoriusCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment
seeding rate, row spacing and cultivarse1
Outcome
plant growth, yield and yield componentse1
Setting
dry conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“in dry conditions, in the years 2013 and 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding rate, row spacing and cultivars have significant effects on plant growth, yield and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars responded similarly to row spacing and planting norm in seed yield in both years.

Taxon
Carthamus tinctoriusCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment
row spacing and planting norme2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“The cultivars responded similarly to both treatments that row spacing and planting norm in terms of seed yield in both research years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil concentration, seed yield and oil yield of safflower increased with increased row spacing and planting rate.

Taxon
Carthamus tinctoriusCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment
row spacing and planting ratee3
Outcome
oil concentration, seed, and oil yielde3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“the oil concentration, seed, and oil yield increased with increased row spacing and planting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1050 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield in safflower could be increased by narrow plantings.

Taxon
Carthamus tinctoriusCarthamus tinctoriust0
Outcome
narrow plantingse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“the seed yield in safflower could be increased by narrow plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1290 · show in text ↑

density · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

density · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.