Paper · 2022 · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Cadmium phytoextraction through Brassica juncea L. under different consortia of plant growth-promoting bacteria from different ecological niches

Qiong Wang; Qiyao Zhou; Lukuan Huang; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Combined bioaugmentation inoculants composed of two or more plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) were more effective than single inoculants for plant growth and cadmium (Cd) removal in contaminated soils. However, the principles of consortia construction still need to be discovered. Here, a pot experiment with Cd natural polluted soil was conducted and PGPB consortia with different ecological niches from hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance were used to compare their effects and mechanisms on plant growth condition, Cd phytoextraction efficiency, soil enzymatic activities, and rhizospheric bacterial community of Brassica juncea L. The results showed that both rhizospheric and endophytic PGPB consortia inoculants promoted plant growth (6.9%-22.1%), facilitated Cd uptake (230.0%-350.0%) of oilseed rape, increased Cd phytoextraction efficiency (343.0%-441.0%), and enhanced soil Cd removal rates (92.0%-144.0%). PGPB consortia inoculants also enhanced soil microbial carbon by 22.2%-50.5%, activated the activities of soil urease and sucrase by 74.7%-158.4% and 8.4%-61.3%, respectively. Simultaneously, PGPB consortia inoculants increased the relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Kosakonia, Pseudomonas and Paraburkholderia at the genus level, which may be beneficial to plant growth promotion and bacterial phytopathogen biocontrol. Although the four PGPB consortia inoculants promoted oilseed growth, amplified Cd phytoextraction, and changed bacterial community structure in rhizosphere soil, their original ecological niches were not a decisive factor for the efficiency of PGPB consortia. therefore, the results enriched the present knowledge regarding the significant roles of PGPB consortia as bioaugmentation agents and preliminarily explored construction principles of effective bioaugmentation inoculants, which will provide insights into the microbial responses to combined inoculation in the Cd-contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizospheric and endophytic PGPB consortia promoted oilseed rape growth by 6.9%-22.1%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
rhizospheric and endophytic PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Value
6.9%-22.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“both rhizospheric and endophytic PGPB consortia inoculants promoted plant growth (6.9%-22.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia facilitated oilseed rape Cd uptake by 230.0%-350.0%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
facilitatede0
Value
230.0%-350.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPB consortia inoculants promoted plant growth (6.9%-22.1%), facilitated Cd uptake (230.0%-350.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia increased oilseed rape Cd phytoextraction efficiency by 343.0%-441.0%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse1
Outcome
Cd phytoextraction efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
343.0%-441.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased Cd phytoextraction efficiency (343.0%-441.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPB consortia inoculants promoted plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia enhanced soil Cd removal rates by 92.0%-144.0%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse1
Outcome
soil Cd removal ratese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
92.0%-144.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhanced soil Cd removal rates (92.0%-144.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPB consortia inoculants promoted plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia enhanced soil microbial carbon by 22.2%-50.5%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
soil microbial carbone0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.2%-50.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPB consortia inoculants also enhanced soil microbial carbon by 22.2%-50.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia activated soil urease by 74.7%-158.4%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Outcome
soil ureasee0
Direction
activatede0
Value
74.7%-158.4%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“activated the activities of soil urease and sucrase by 74.7%-158.4% and 8.4%-61.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia activated soil sucrase by 8.4%-61.3%.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
sucrasee0
Direction
activatede0
Value
8.4%-61.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPB consortia inoculants also enhanced soil microbial carbon by 22.2%-50.5%, activated the activities of soil urease and sucrase by 74.7%-158.4% and 8.4%-61.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia increased relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Rhodanobacter and Kosakonia.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Kosakoniae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPB consortia inoculants increased the relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Kosakonia, Pseudomonas and Paraburkholderia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB consortia increased relative abundance of Pseudomonas and Paraburkholderia.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortia inoculantse0
Outcome
Pseudomonas and Paraburkholderiae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPB consortia inoculants increased the relative abundance of Flavobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Kosakonia, Pseudomonas and Paraburkholderia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1252 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The original ecological niches of consortia were not decisive for their efficiency.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPB consortiae0
Outcome
efficiency of PGPB consortiae0
Qualifier
original ecological nichese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica juncea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“their original ecological niches were not a decisive factor for the efficiency of PGPB consortia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1621 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · pest · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · organism · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.