Paper · 2022 · Annals of Plant and Soil Research

Productivity, nutrient uptake and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris) and soil fertility as influenced by organic manures and fertilizers

SANDEEP SINGH

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Panwari village of Agra district, (Uttar Pradesh) to study the effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on yield, uptake of nutrients and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). Treatments consisting four levels of organic manures and three levels of inorganic fertilizers were evaluated in factorial randomized block design with three replications. Results revealed that application of 2.5t FYM + 1.25 t vermicompost ha-1 resulted in significantly maximum value of plant height (51.2cm), branches/plant (7.4) and pods/plant (116.3) as compared to application of 5t FYM and 2.5t vermicompost ha-1 alone and control. Similarly, application of 100% RDF also produced significantly taller plants (50.6cm) and maximum branches/plant (7.6),pods/plant (116.2), grain (1.65t ha-1 and straw (2.01t ha-1) yields. The increases in grain and straw yield were 33.0 and 28.0%, respectively due to 100% RDF over control. The significantly highest yield of grain (1.75 t ha-1) and straw (2.12t ha-1) were recorded with combined application of 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 than those of 5t FYM and 2.5t vermicompost ha-1 alone and control. The increases in grain and straw yield due to 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 were 53.5 and 50.3% over control, respectively. The interaction effect of 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 and 100% RDF recorded maximum yield of grain (1.95t ha-1) and straw (2.31t ha-1) than other treatment combinations. Combined application of FYM (2.5t ha-1) and vermicompost (1.25t ha-1) recorded significantly highest protein content in grain and straw of lentil. The uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and S) and status of these nutrients in post harvest soil were recorded maximum with 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1. Application of 100% RDF also resulted in significantly higher values of protein content, uptake of nutrients and status of available nutrients in post harvest soil than that of 50% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure produced the tallest lentil plants, most branches, and most pods relative to single manures and control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25 t vermicompost ha-1e0
Outcome
plant height (51.2cm), branches/plant (7.4) and pods/plant (116.3)e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2.5t FYM + 1.25 t vermicompost ha-1 resulted in significantly maximum value of plant height (51.2cm), branches/plant (7.4) and pods/plant (116.3) as compared to application of 5t FYM and 2.5t vermicompost ha-1 alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer dose produced taller plants and more branches and pods.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
plants (50.6cm) and maximum branches/plant (7.6),pods/plant (116.2)e0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 100% RDF also produced significantly taller plants (50.6cm) and maximum branches/plant (7.6),pods/plant (116.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer dose increased grain yield by 33.0% over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasese0
Value
33.0e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increases in grain and straw yield were 33.0 and 28.0%, respectively due to 100% RDF over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer dose increased straw yield by 28.0% over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
28.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increases in grain and straw yield were 33.0 and 28.0%, respectively due to 100% RDF over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure increased grain yield by 53.5% over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasese0
Value
53.5e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increases in grain and straw yield due to 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 were 53.5 and 50.3% over control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure increased straw yield by 50.3% over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
50.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increases in grain and straw yield due to 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 were 53.5 and 50.3% over control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure and full fertilizer produced maximum grain yield of 1.95t ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 and 100% RDFe0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.95t ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect of 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 and 100% RDF recorded maximum yield of grain (1.95t ha-1) and straw (2.31t ha-1) than other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure and full fertilizer produced maximum straw yield of 2.31t ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 and 100% RDFe0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.31t ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect of 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1 and 100% RDF recorded maximum yield of grain (1.95t ha-1) and straw (2.31t ha-1) than other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure produced the highest protein content in lentil grain and straw.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
FYM (2.5t ha-1) and vermicompost (1.25t ha-1)e0
Outcome
protein content in grain and strawe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of FYM (2.5t ha-1) and vermicompost (1.25t ha-1) recorded significantly highest protein content in grain and straw of lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure maximized nutrient uptake and postharvest soil nutrient status.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and S) and status of these nutrients in post harvest soile0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and S) and status of these nutrients in post harvest soil were recorded maximum with 2.5t FYM + 1.25t vermicompost ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full fertilizer gave higher protein content, nutrient uptake and available postharvest soil nutrients than half fertilizer.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
protein content, uptake of nutrients and status of available nutrients in post harvest soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 100% RDF also resulted in significantly higher values of protein content, uptake of nutrients and status of available nutrients in post harvest soil than that of 50% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2018 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.