Paper · 2022 · Phyton

Effects of Rate and Source Organo-Mineral Material on Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Barley-Pea Mixed under Arid Conditions

Walid Soufan; Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cereal-legume intercropping plays a vital role in the subsistence food production system that prevails in the arid regions. It not only provides profitable crop productivity for agricultural communities but also plays an important role in improving soil fertility. Therefore, the present research was conducted to assess the effect of the organic and mineral fertilizers on the forage yield and nutritional value in barley-pea intercropping system. The results revealed that the quality of forage grass is significantly influenced by both organic and inorganic fertilizer. Thus, organic fertilizer application has significantly influenced the dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Among the treatments, organic fertilizer added at rate of 35 m−3 ha−1 produced the maximum fresh and dry matter in barley and peas. In addition, the same level of organic fertilizer also improved silage composition by significantly increasing the protein and fiber content and showed highest the values. Based on overall results, it is concluded that organic fertilizer treatment (35 m−3 ha−1) has the potential as an effective strategy to improve the productivity and nutritional quality of the barley-pea intercropping system in arid areas. The results revealed that organic fertilizer can be utilized in sustainable agricultural as a source of nutrients for numerous various crops under arid conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly influenced dry matter, crude ash and crude protein of barley-pea forage.

Taxon
Barley-Peat0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP)e0
Setting
Arid Conditionst0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Barley-Pea Mixed under Arid Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thus, organic fertilizer application has significantly influenced the dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly influenced neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of barley-pea forage.

Taxon
Barley-Peat0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)e0
Setting
Arid Conditionst0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Barley-Pea Mixed under Arid Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thus, organic fertilizer application has significantly influenced the dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer at 35 m3 per ha gave the maximum fresh and dry matter of barley and peas.

Treatment
organic fertilizer added at rate of 35 m−3 ha−1e1
Outcome
fresh and dry mattere1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“organic fertilizer added at rate of 35 m−3 ha−1 produced the maximum fresh and dry matter in barley and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same organic fertilizer level significantly increased protein and fiber content of the silage and gave the highest values.

Taxon
Barley-Peat0
Treatment
organic fertilizere2
Outcome
protein and fiber contente2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Barley-Pea Mixed under Arid Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“the same level of organic fertilizer also improved silage composition by significantly increasing the protein and fiber content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1031 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer at 35 m3 per ha has potential to improve productivity and nutritional quality of the barley-pea intercropping system in arid areas.

Taxon
barley-pea intercropping systeme3
Treatment
organic fertilizer treatment (35 m−3 ha−1)e3
Outcome
productivity and nutritional qualitye3

Verbatim

e3

“organic fertilizer treatment (35 m−3 ha−1) has the potential as an effective strategy to improve the productivity and nutritional quality of the barley-pea intercropping system in arid areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1300 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.