Paper · 2019 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Effect of microbial fertilizer, bio-stimulant, multivitamin, macro and micro elementson growth, leaf chemical composition, yield and fruit quality of "Fagri Kelan"mango trees, grown in sandy soil

M Fwazi; Laila Hagagg; M Shahin; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The current study was conducted through 2017 and 2018 seasons on mango trees Fagri Kelan cv. The target of this work was to evaluate the influence of microbial fertilizer, bio-stimulant, multivitamin, macro and micro elements in the form of commercial compounds as Hormufol (biostimulant, Multivitamin, macro and micro elements) and Nile fertile (microorganism and macro elements) on growth measurement, leaf mineral and pigments content, yield and fruit quality. Hormufol (H) was used as a foliar spray in spring (mid-March) whereas Nile fertile (N.F) applied as a soil drench in autumn (mid-November). Data demonstrate that the applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles, leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B), leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic), yield as well as fruit chemical and physical properties. Economically, the best results fruit quality and quantity were gained when "Fagri Kelan" mango trees sprayed with Hormufol 3g/l as a foliar spray on vegetative growth plus Nile fertile at 2.0 kg/ tree as a soil drench.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased mango shoot and leaf growth.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
different used treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in the three growth cyclese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 163–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased mango leaf pigments.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
different used treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles, leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B), leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic), yield as well as fruit chemical and physical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 163–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased mango leaf mineral contents.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
different used treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles, leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B), leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic), yield as well as fruit chemical and physical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 163–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased mango yield.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
different used treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles, leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B), leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic), yield as well as fruit chemical and physical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 163–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased mango fruit chemical and physical properties.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
different used treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit chemical and physical propertiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of different used treatments increased significantly shoot length, number of leaves/ shoots, and leaf area in the three growth cycles, leaf pigments content (Ch. 1 A & B), leaf minerals contents (Nitrogen, Phosphor, potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, iron, Zink and Manganic), yield as well as fruit chemical and physical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 163–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormufol plus Nile fertile gave the best economic fruit quality and quantity result.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicae0
Material
Fagri Kelane0
Treatment
Hormufol 3g/l as a foliar spray on vegetative growth plus Nile fertile at 2.0 kg/ tree as a soil drenche0
Outcome
fruit quality and quantitye0
Direction
best resultse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best results fruit quality and quantity were gained when "Fagri Kelan" mango trees sprayed with Hormufol 3g/l as a foliar spray on vegetative growth plus Nile fertile at 2.0 kg/ tree as a soil drench.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1191 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.