Paper · 2001 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Effects of Natural Intensities of Visible and Ultraviolet Radiation on Epidermal Ultraviolet Screening and Photosynthesis in Grape Leaves

C. A. Kolb

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d. Different light regimes were produced by filters transmitting natural radiation, or screening out the UV-B (280–315 nm), or screening out the UV-A (315–400 nm) and the UV-B spectral range. During exposure, synthesis of UV-screening phenolics in leaves was quantified using HPLC: All treatments increased concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acids but the rise was highest, reaching 230% of the initial value, when UV radiation was absent. In contrast, UV-B radiation specifically increased flavonoid concentrations resulting in more than a 10-fold increase. Transmittance in the UV of all extracted phenolics was lower than epidermal UV transmittance determined fluorimetrically, and the two parameters were curvilinearly related. It is suggested that curvilinearity results from different absorption properties of the homogeneously dissolved phenolics in extracts and of the non-homogeneous distribution of phenolics in the epidermis. UV-B-dependent inhibition of maximum photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII), measured as variable fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves, recovered in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screening for UV-B radiation, suggesting that PSII is protected against UV-B damage by epidermal screening. However, UV-B inhibition of CO2assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening. We propose that protection of UV-B inactivation of PSII is observed because preceding damage is efficiently repaired while those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation recover more slowly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All light treatments increased hydroxycinnamic acid concentrations in grape leaves during exposure.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Silvanere0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
three different light regimese0
Compound
hydroxycinnamic acidse2
Outcome
concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acidse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
initial valuee2
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“During exposure, synthesis of UV-screening phenolics in leaves was quantified using HPLC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–504 · show in text ↑
e2

“All treatments increased concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acids but the rise was highest, reaching 230% of the initial value, when UV radiation was absent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroxycinnamic acid concentrations rose highest, to 230% of the initial value, when UV radiation was absent.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Silvanere0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
UV radiation was absente2
Compound
hydroxycinnamic acidse2
Outcome
concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acidse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
230%e2
Comparator
initial valuee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“During exposure, synthesis of UV-screening phenolics in leaves was quantified using HPLC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–504 · show in text ↑
e2

“All treatments increased concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acids but the rise was highest, reaching 230% of the initial value, when UV radiation was absent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B radiation specifically increased flavonoid concentrations in grape leaves by more than 10-fold.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Silvanere0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
UV-B radiatione3
Compound
flavonoide3
Outcome
flavonoid concentrationse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
more than a 10-fold increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“During exposure, synthesis of UV-screening phenolics in leaves was quantified using HPLC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–504 · show in text ↑
e3

“In contrast, UV-B radiation specifically increased flavonoid concentrations resulting in more than a 10-fold increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV transmittance of extracted phenolics was lower than epidermal UV transmittance.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Compound
phenolicse4
Outcome
Transmittance in the UV of all extracted phenolicse4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
epidermal UV transmittancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e4

“Transmittance in the UV of all extracted phenolics was lower than epidermal UV transmittance determined fluorimetrically, and the two parameters were curvilinearly related”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–953 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV transmittance of extracted phenolics and epidermal UV transmittance were curvilinearly related.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Compound
phenolicse4
Outcome
curvilinearly relatede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e4

“Transmittance in the UV of all extracted phenolics was lower than epidermal UV transmittance determined fluorimetrically, and the two parameters were curvilinearly related”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–953 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Curvilinearity between the two transmittance measures is suggested to result from different absorption properties of dissolved extracts and the non-homogeneous epidermal distribution of phenolics.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Compound
phenolicse5
Outcome
curvilinearitye5
Qualifier
different absorption properties of the homogeneously dissolved phenolics in extracts and of the non-homogeneous distribution of phenolics in the epidermise5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e5

“It is suggested that curvilinearity results from different absorption properties of the homogeneously dissolved phenolics in extracts and of the non-homogeneous distribution of phenolics in the epidermis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1158 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B-dependent inhibition of maximum photochemical yield of PSII recovered in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screening against UV-B.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Organ / stage
dark-adapted leavese6
Treatment
UV-B radiatione6
Outcome
maximum photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII)e6
Direction
recoverede6
Qualifier
in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screeninge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e6

“UV-B-dependent inhibition of maximum photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII), measured as variable fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves, recovered in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screening for UV-B radiation, suggesting that PSII is protected against UV-B damage by epidermal screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1457 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PSII is suggested to be protected against UV-B damage by epidermal screening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
PSII is protected against UV-B damagee6
Qualifier
by epidermal screeninge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e6

“UV-B-dependent inhibition of maximum photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII), measured as variable fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves, recovered in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screening for UV-B radiation, suggesting that PSII is protected against UV-B damage by epidermal screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
efficient UV-B screeninge7
Outcome
UV-B inhibition of CO2assimilation ratese7
Direction
not diminishede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, UV-B inhibition of CO2assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening. We propose that protection of UV-B inactivation of PSII is observed because preceding damage is efficiently repaired while those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation recover more slowly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1761 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Protection of PSII against UV-B inactivation is suggested to occur because preceding damage is efficiently repaired.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
protection of UV-B inactivation of PSIIe7
Qualifier
preceding damage is efficiently repairede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, UV-B inhibition of CO2assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening. We propose that protection of UV-B inactivation of PSII is observed because preceding damage is efficiently repaired while those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation recover more slowly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1761 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation are suggested to recover more slowly.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilatione7
Qualifier
recover more slowlye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, UV-B inhibition of CO2assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening. We propose that protection of UV-B inactivation of PSII is observed because preceding damage is efficiently repaired while those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO2 assimilation recover more slowly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1761 · show in text ↑