Paper · 2005 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Impact of Twospotted Spider Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Growth and Productivity of Glasshouse Cucumbers

Yong-Lak Park; Joon-Ho Lee

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to assess the damage of the glasshouse cucumber by twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, and to investigate when the economic yield begins to decrease after T. urticae infestations. To assess the damage, dry matter partitioning in the cucumber plant was quantified and plant growth analyses were conducted at four different T. urticae infestation levels. T. urticae infestations decreased leaf productivity by reducing the total number of leaves per plant. Approximately 14% reductions of total leaf areas could result in significant yield loss. The decreased leaf productivity by T. urticae feeding caused biomass reductions and altered the pattern of dry matter partitioning in the plant; damaged plants accumulated more dry matter in the leaf, and partitioning of dry matter to fruits was hindered. The economic yield of cucumber began to significantly decrease as early as 4 wk after heavy mite infestations. This study also showed the seasonal differences in T. urticae–cucumber damage interactions among mite infestation levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite infestations reduced cucumber leaf productivity by reducing the number of leaves per plant.

Taxon
CucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T. urticae infestationse0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
leaf productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. urticae infestations decreased leaf productivity by reducing the total number of leaves per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glasshouse Cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–106 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

About 14% less leaf area could cause significant cucumber yield loss.

Taxon
CucumbersCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
14%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 14% reductions of total leaf areas could result in significant yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glasshouse Cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite feeding reduced cucumber biomass.

Taxon
CucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T. urticae feedinge0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decreased leaf productivity by T. urticae feeding caused biomass reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glasshouse Cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damaged cucumber plants accumulated more dry matter in leaves.

Taxon
CucumbersCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
dry matter in the leafe0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damaged plants accumulated more dry matter in the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glasshouse Cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite damage hindered dry matter partitioning to cucumber fruit.

Taxon
CucumbersCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
partitioning of dry matter to fruitse0
Direction
hinderede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partitioning of dry matter to fruits was hindered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glasshouse Cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber economic yield significantly decreased as early as four weeks after heavy mite infestation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
heavy mite infestationse0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
economic yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
4 wke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic yield of cucumber began to significantly decrease as early as 4 wk after heavy mite infestations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite damage to cucumber differed by season and infestation level.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
seasonal differences in T. urticae–cucumber damage interactionse0
Qualifier
mite infestation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seasonal differences in T. urticae–cucumber damage interactions among mite infestation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1073 · show in text ↑

Tetranychus urticae · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Tetranychus urticae · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

infection · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.