Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India)

Performance Evaluation of Tractor Operated Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Clove Planter

Shubham Zilpilwar; Rajvir Yadav

20
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is an important foreign exchange earner for India. The farmers generally plant garlic by manual method, which is labour intensive and time consuming. A tractor-operated garlic clove planter was developed and evaluated for its performance in the field. The average wheel slip, draft and average depth of seed placement by the developed planter were 6.93 %, 289.83 kg, and 42.1 mm, respectively. The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests. The effective field capacity and field efficiency of the developed planter were 0.33 ha.h-1 and 80.33; 0.32 ha.h-1 and 79.02 %, respectively, for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic seeds. The cost of planting by the developed planter with operational cost of tractor was ` 553.63 per hour (` 1677.67 per ha), and was less as compared to available planting machineries for garlic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planter had 6.93 % average wheel slip.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
wheel slipe0
Value
6.93 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average wheel slip, draft and average depth of seed placement by the developed planter were 6.93 %, 289.83 kg, and 42.1 mm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planter draft was 289.83 kg.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
drafte0
Value
289.83 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average wheel slip, draft and average depth of seed placement by the developed planter were 6.93 %, 289.83 kg, and 42.1 mm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average garlic seed placement depth was 42.1 mm.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
average depth of seed placemente0
Value
42.1 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average wheel slip, draft and average depth of seed placement by the developed planter were 6.93 %, 289.83 kg, and 42.1 mm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 planter seed spacing was 99.4 mm.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
seed spacinge0
Value
99.4 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 planter miss index was 6.12 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
miss indexe0
Value
6.12 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 multiple index was 7.91 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
multiple indexe0
Value
7.91 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 quality of feed index was 85.96 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
quality of feed indexe0
Value
85.96 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 seed rate was 377 kg.ha-1.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
seed ratee0
Value
377 kg.ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-4 seed metering efficiency was 96.35 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
seed metering efficiencye0
Value
96.35 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 seed spacing was 99.9 mm.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
seed spacinge0
Value
99.9 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 miss index was 4.58 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
miss indexe0
Value
4.58 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 multiple index was 6.07 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
multiple indexe0
Value
6.07 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 quality of feed index was 89.34 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
quality of feed indexe0
Value
89.34 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 seed rate was 443 kg.ha-1.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
seed ratee0
Value
443 kg.ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GG-5 seed metering efficiency was 96.75 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
seed metering efficiencye0
Value
96.75 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average seed spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective field capacity was 0.33 ha.h-1 for GG-4.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
effective field capacitye0
Value
0.33 ha.h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective field capacity and field efficiency of the developed planter were 0.33 ha.h-1 and 80.33; 0.32 ha.h-1 and 79.02 %, respectively, for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–906 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field efficiency was reported as 80.33 for GG-4.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-4e0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
80.33e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective field capacity and field efficiency of the developed planter were 0.33 ha.h-1 and 80.33; 0.32 ha.h-1 and 79.02 %, respectively, for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–906 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective field capacity was 0.32 ha.h-1 for GG-5.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
effective field capacitye0
Value
0.32 ha.h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective field capacity and field efficiency of the developed planter were 0.33 ha.h-1 and 80.33; 0.32 ha.h-1 and 79.02 %, respectively, for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–906 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field efficiency was 79.02 % for GG-5.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
GG-5e0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
79.02 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective field capacity and field efficiency of the developed planter were 0.33 ha.h-1 and 80.33; 0.32 ha.h-1 and 79.02 %, respectively, for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–906 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The developed planter cost less than available garlic planting machinery at 1677.67 per ha.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Outcome
cost of plantinge0
Direction
lesse0
Value
1677.67 per hae0
Comparator
available planting machineries for garlice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cost of planting by the developed planter with operational cost of tractor was ` 553.63 per hour (` 1677.67 per ha), and was less as compared to available planting machineries for garlic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1098 · show in text ↑