Claim · model-written summary
The developed planter cost less than available garlic planting machinery at 1677.67 per ha.
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Outcome
- cost of plantinge0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 1677.67 per hae0
- Comparator
- available planting machineries for garlice0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cost of planting by the developed planter with operational cost of tractor was ` 553.63 per hour (` 1677.67 per ha), and was less as compared to available planting machineries for garlic.”
Title
Performance Evaluation of Tractor Operated Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Clove Planter
Shubham Zilpilwar; Rajvir Yadav Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2021. doi:10.52151/jae2021581.1730
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Method / resource The planter had 6.93 % average wheel slip.
- Method / resource The planter draft was 289.83 kg.
- Method / resource Average garlic seed placement depth was 42.1 mm.
- Method / resource The GG-4 planter seed spacing was 99.4 mm.
- Method / resource The GG-4 planter miss index was 6.12 %.
- Method / resource The GG-4 multiple index was 7.91 %.
- Method / resource The GG-4 quality of feed index was 85.96 %.
- Method / resource The GG-4 seed rate was 377 kg.ha-1.
- Method / resource The GG-4 seed metering efficiency was 96.35 %.
- Method / resource The GG-5 seed spacing was 99.9 mm.
- Method / resource The GG-5 miss index was 4.58 %.
- Method / resource The GG-5 multiple index was 6.07 %.
- Method / resource The GG-5 quality of feed index was 89.34 %.
- Method / resource The GG-5 seed rate was 443 kg.ha-1.
- Method / resource The GG-5 seed metering efficiency was 96.75 %.
- Method / resource Effective field capacity was 0.33 ha.h-1 for GG-4.
- Method / resource Field efficiency was reported as 80.33 for GG-4.
- Method / resource Effective field capacity was 0.32 ha.h-1 for GG-5.
- Method / resource Field efficiency was 79.02 % for GG-5.