Paper · 2019 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Effect of grafting date and rootstock type on vegetative growth parameters of Flame seedless grape grafted on three nematode resistant rootstocks

K Nabila; A Abd-Allah; R Amal; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out during two successive seasons of 2012 and 2013 in a private vineyard located at Sadat city, Menofia Governorate, Egypt. to investigate the influence of three grapevine rootstocks; namely, Harmony, Freedom and Salt creek at two different grafting dates using Cleft grafting method on the percentage of survival and growth parameters of Flame seedless cv. at two grafting dates.(January and February months). The survival percentage and (F.C.C.) varied significantly according to rootstock type, grafting dates and the interaction between them. Freedom rootstock recorded the highest survival percentage and (F.C.C.) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively, while Harmony rootstock exhibited the lowest figures in both seasons, regardless of grafting date. Meanwhile, rootstocks grafted in mid February recorded significantly higher survival percentage in 2012 and 2013 seasons than those grafted on mid January regardless of rootstock type. The same result was detected for F.C.C. value in 2012 season only. On the other hand, Feb. grafting exhibited greater shoot length and leaf area than Jan. grafting regardless of rootstock type. The interaction between rootstock type and grafting date showed that Flame seedless cv. grafted on Freedom rootstock on mid February gained the maximum values of scion shoot length (93.84 and 100.15 cm) and leaf area (130.35 and 143.69 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively. Contrastly, the same scion when grafted on Harmony rootstock on mid January recorded the minimum value of shoot length (59.12 and 56.16 cm) and leaf area (51.27 and 64.10 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively. Freedom rootstock recorded the maximum figures of fresh and dryweight of the aerial portion (leaves and shoots) and root systemin the two seasons followed by Salt creek rootstock without significant difference between them. While, Harmony rootstock showed the minimum values in the two studied seasons. Grafting in Feb. 15th was better than in Jan. 15 th especially in 2012 season regardless of rootstock type.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival and F.C.C. varied significantly by rootstock, graft date and their interaction.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstock type, grafting dates and the interaction between theme0
Outcome
survival percentage and (F.C.C.)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The survival percentage and (F.C.C.) varied significantly according to rootstock type, grafting dates and the interaction between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock gave the highest survival and F.C.C.; Harmony gave the lowest.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Freedom rootstocke0
Outcome
survival percentage and (F.C.C.)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Harmony rootstocke0

Verbatim

e0

“Freedom rootstock recorded the highest survival percentage and (F.C.C.) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively, while Harmony rootstock exhibited the lowest figures in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid February grafting raised survival in both seasons relative to mid January.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
mid Februarye0
Outcome
survival percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mid Januarye0

Verbatim

e0

“rootstocks grafted in mid February recorded significantly higher survival percentage in 2012 and 2013 seasons than those grafted on mid January”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid February grafting raised F.C.C. in 2012 relative to mid January.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
mid Februarye1
Outcome
F.C.C. valuee0
Direction
highere1
Comparator
mid Januarye1

Verbatim

e0

“The same result was detected for F.C.C. value in 2012 season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“mid February recorded significantly higher survival percentage in 2012 and 2013 seasons than those grafted on mid January”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

February grafting gave greater shoot length and leaf area than January grafting.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Feb. graftinge0
Outcome
shoot length and leaf areae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Jan. graftinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Feb. grafting exhibited greater shoot length and leaf area than Jan. grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock and mid February grafting gave maximum scion shoot length in 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
Flame seedless cv.e0
Treatment
Freedom rootstock on mid Februarye0
Outcome
scion shoot lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
93.84 and 100.15 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Flame seedless cv. grafted on Freedom rootstock on mid February gained the maximum values of scion shoot length (93.84 and 100.15 cm) and leaf area (130.35 and 143.69 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock and mid February grafting gave maximum leaf area in 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
Flame seedless cv.e0
Treatment
Freedom rootstock on mid Februarye0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
130.35 and 143.69 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Flame seedless cv. grafted on Freedom rootstock on mid February gained the maximum values of scion shoot length (93.84 and 100.15 cm) and leaf area (130.35 and 143.69 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock and mid January grafting gave minimum shoot length.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Harmony rootstock on mid Januarye0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
59.12 and 56.16 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Harmony rootstock on mid January recorded the minimum value of shoot length (59.12 and 56.16 cm) and leaf area (51.27 and 64.10 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock and mid January grafting gave minimum leaf area.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Harmony rootstock on mid Januarye0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
minimume0
Value
51.27 and 64.10 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Harmony rootstock on mid January recorded the minimum value of shoot length (59.12 and 56.16 cm) and leaf area (51.27 and 64.10 cm2) in 2012 and 2013 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock gave maximum fresh and dry weight of aerial and root portions, followed by Salt creek without significant difference.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Freedom rootstocke0
Outcome
fresh and dryweight of the aerial portion (leaves and shoots) and root systemine0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Salt creek rootstocke0

Verbatim

e0

“Freedom rootstock recorded the maximum figures of fresh and dryweight of the aerial portion (leaves and shoots) and root systemin the two seasons followed by Salt creek rootstock without significant difference between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1886 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock gave minimum growth measures in both seasons.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Harmony rootstocke0
Outcome
minimum valuese0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Harmony rootstock showed the minimum values in the two studied seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–1965 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

31 papers: 20 positive, 11 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

grafting · survival · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.