Paper · 2015 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Effect of Planting Systems and Growing Media on Earliness, Yield and Quality of Strawberry Cultivation under Soilless Culture

Nafiye ADAK; Hamide GUBBUK

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soilless growing is becoming an attractive option because of the contamination of agricultural land due to the use of excessive fertilisers and insecticides to get higher productivity per unit area and the yield advantage with soilless culture getting more yield per unit area than the conventional growing. Effects of two planting systems and various growing media on earliness, yield and quality (colour L, C, ho, the rupture of calyx, firmness, total soluble solid, acidity and vitamin C) in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivation under soilless culture was studied. Two different planting seasons i.e., summer and fall were chosen and growing media was composed of peat (Pt), perlite (Pr), cocopeat (Co), volcanic tuff (Vlc) and their combinations. Results showed that fall planting system was favourable in terms of earliness but summer planting gave better results in terms of total yield. Moreover, the first harvest of summer planting was February, whereas the first harvest of the fall planting was in December. Early yield in the fall planting comprised 36.0% of the total yield. The Co and the Co+Vlc media were more favourable than other media with regard to yield, earliness and fruit quality. In addition vegetation period was found from January to May and it was observed that as the total soluble solids values increased in fruits, acidity and vitamin C values decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall planting favored strawberry earliness relative to summer planting.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
fall plantinge0
Outcome
earlinesse0
Direction
favourablee0
Comparator
summer plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fall planting system was favourable in terms of earliness but summer planting gave better results in terms of total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer planting gave better total strawberry yield than fall planting.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
summer plantinge0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
fall plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fall planting system was favourable in terms of earliness but summer planting gave better results in terms of total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First harvest occurred in February for summer planted strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
summer plantinge0
Outcome
first harveste0
Value
Februarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first harvest of summer planting was February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First harvest occurred in December for fall planted strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
fall plantinge0
Outcome
first harveste0
Value
Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first harvest of the fall planting was in December”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield comprised 36.0% of total yield with fall planting.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
fall plantinge0
Outcome
Early yielde0
Value
36.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early yield in the fall planting comprised 36.0% of the total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co medium was more favorable for strawberry yield, earliness and fruit quality than other media.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Coe0
Outcome
yield, earliness and fruit qualitye0
Direction
more favourablee0
Comparator
other mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Co and the Co+Vlc media were more favourable than other media with regard to yield, earliness and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co+Vlc medium was more favorable for strawberry yield, earliness and fruit quality than other media.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Co+Vlce0
Outcome
yield, earliness and fruit qualitye0
Direction
more favourablee0
Comparator
other mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Co and the Co+Vlc media were more favourable than other media with regard to yield, earliness and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strawberry vegetation period was January to May.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
vegetation periode0
Value
January to Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetation period was found from January to May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry fruit acidity decreased as total soluble solids increased.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
total soluble solids values increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the total soluble solids values increased in fruits, acidity and vitamin C values decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry fruit vitamin C decreased as total soluble solids increased.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
vitamin C valuese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
total soluble solids values increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the total soluble solids values increased in fruits, acidity and vitamin C values decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑

cobalt atom · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.