Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the surface and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) application effects on sugar beet crop performance, under two levels (100% and 80%) of water application depth. The experimental design was a split plot with four replications. Laterals were set every second crop row (1 m apart), with emitters spaced 1 m apart. In the case of SDI, laterals were buried 0.45 m under the ground. Soil moisture measurements were taken up to 75 cm depth, using the TDR method. The soil water content and the yield characteristics of each treatment were recorded. Irrigation method showed to affect crop performance significantly while water application level was less critical. The experimental results indicated that the subsurface drip irrigation leaded to a greater yield and higher sugar content making significant water saving compared to surface drip irrigation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation produced greater sugar beet yield than surface drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- subsurface drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- surface drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the subsurface drip irrigation leaded to a greater yield and higher sugar content making significant water saving compared to surface drip irrigation”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation produced higher sugar content than surface drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- subsurface drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- surface drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the subsurface drip irrigation leaded to a greater yield and higher sugar content making significant water saving compared to surface drip irrigation”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation saved water compared with surface drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- subsurface drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water savinge0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Comparator
- surface drip irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the subsurface drip irrigation leaded to a greater yield and higher sugar content making significant water saving compared to surface drip irrigation”
t0“sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.