Paper · 1988 · CORD

SOIL PROPERTIES AND NUTRIENT ELEMENT STATUS OF COCONUT LEAVES UNDER DEFFERENT CROPPING PATTERNS

Doah Dekok Tarigans

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of six co­conut cropping patterns on the soil properties and nutrient element status of coconut leaves. The experiments were carried out from August 1984 to May 1985 in Silang, Cavite, Philippines. Data on‑soil properties and nutrient element starus of coconut leaves were statistically analyzed in Randomized Block Design with three replications. Six cropping patterns in coconut with four species of perennial crops as intercrops, namely: banana, papaya, coffee and pineapple were used in this study. The organic matter, pH and cation exchange capacity of the soils did not differ significantly with cropping pattern although intensively cropped farms tended to have higher organic matter' and cation exchange capacity values. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the top soil were significantly higher in most intensive intercropped farms, but calcium and magnesium did not vary significantly. Moisture content, waterholding capacity, bulk density and particle density of the soil did not show significant difference with cropping patterns. Likewise, the number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in the soil remained statistically the same. Leaf nitrogen and calcium, in­creased while potassium decreased with intensity of cropping. Phosphorus and magnesium showed no definite trend.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter, pH and cation exchange capacity did not differ significantly among cropping patterns.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
cropping patterne0
Outcome
organic matter, pH and cation exchange capacity of the soilse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The organic matter, pH and cation exchange capacity of the soils did not differ significantly with cropping pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More intensively cropped farms tended toward higher soil organic matter and cation exchange capacity.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
organic matter' and cation exchange capacity valuese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
intensively cropped farmse0

Verbatim

e0

“intensively cropped farms tended to have higher organic matter' and cation exchange capacity values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsoil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly higher in most intensive intercropped farms.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the top soile0
Direction
highere0
Setting
most intensive intercropped farmse0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the top soil were significantly higher in most intensive intercropped farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil calcium and magnesium did not vary significantly.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
calcium and magnesiume0
Direction
did not varye0

Verbatim

e0

“calcium and magnesium did not vary significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture content, waterholding capacity, bulk density and particle density showed no significant differences among cropping patterns.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
cropping patternse0
Outcome
Moisture content, waterholding capacity, bulk density and particle density of the soile0
Direction
did not show significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content, waterholding capacity, bulk density and particle density of the soil did not show significant difference with cropping patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycete numbers remained statistically unchanged.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in the soile0
Direction
remained statistically the samee0

Verbatim

e0

“the number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in the soil remained statistically the same.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut leaf nitrogen and calcium increased with cropping intensity.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
intensity of croppinge0
Outcome
Leaf nitrogen and calciume0
Direction
in­creasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen and calcium, in­creased while potassium decreased with intensity of cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut leaf potassium decreased with cropping intensity.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
intensity of croppinge0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen and calcium, in­creased while potassium decreased with intensity of cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut leaf phosphorus and magnesium showed no definite trend with cropping intensity.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
Phosphorus and magnesiume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and magnesium showed no definite trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑