Paper · 2021 · Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Impact of applying organic fertilizers on nutrient content of soil and lettuceplants, yield quality and benefit-cost ratio under water stress conditions

Dalia Ahmed; Abd El-Fattah; Fadl Abd-Elhamid; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The possible scarcity of available water for irrigation, climate change implications and environmental issues created the motivation for investigating new ways of increasing water use efficiency for crops. A field experiment was conducted, during two growing seasons, under open field conditions at Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. The study aimed to determine the effect of different irrigation water levels (60, 80 and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc)) and fertilization (mineral fertilizers (control), farmyard manure (FYM), biochar, compost and vermi-compost) on growth, yield, water use efficiency and nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). The experimental design was split plot; the irrigation water levels located at main plots and fertilization types located at sub-plots. Applying different irrigation water levels and fertilizers significantly affected the vegetative growth and yield traits, i.e., no. of leaves, weight, head length and width, and total chlorophyll, as well as nutrient contents (N, P and K) and total soluble solids (TSS). Data revealed that using vermicompost fertilizer reduced irrigation water requirements of lettuce plants, compared with control treatment. Also, vermi-compost treatment gave the highest values of the studied plant traits, during the two tested seasons. Increasing irrigation level up to 80% of ETc enhanced the yield, with additions of organic fertilizer treatments, and increased water use efficiency. Moreover, the treatment of vermi-compost + 80% of ETc gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR values were 3.08 and 2.77 during the two tested seasons, respectively), while the lowest ones (0.85 and 0.93) were recorded by applying the treatment of mineral fertilizers+ 60% of ETc during the two studied seasons, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost fertilizer reduced irrigation water requirements of lettuce compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
vermicompost fertilizere1
Outcome
irrigation water requirementse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using vermicompost fertilizer reduced irrigation water requirements of lettuce plants, compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermi-compost treatment gave the highest values of the studied lettuce plant traits.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
vermi-compost treatmente2
Outcome
studied plant traitse2
Direction
highest valuese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“vermi-compost treatment gave the highest values of the studied plant traits, during the two tested seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% of ETc enhanced lettuce yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing irrigation level up to 80% of ETce3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing irrigation level up to 80% of ETc enhanced the yield, with additions of organic fertilizer treatments, and increased water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% of ETc increased lettuce water use efficiency.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing irrigation level up to 80% of ETce3
Outcome
water use efficiencye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing irrigation level up to 80% of ETc enhanced the yield, with additions of organic fertilizer treatments, and increased water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermi-compost with 80% of ETc gave the highest lettuce benefit-cost ratio (3.08 and 2.77).

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
vermi-compost + 80% of ETce4
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.08 and 2.77e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment of vermi-compost + 80% of ETc gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR values were 3.08 and 2.77 during the two tested seasons, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers with 60% of ETc gave the lowest lettuce benefit-cost ratio (0.85 and 0.93).

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
mineral fertilizers+ 60% of ETce5
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe4
Direction
loweste5
Value
0.85 and 0.93e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment of vermi-compost + 80% of ETc gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR values were 3.08 and 2.77 during the two tested seasons, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1642 · show in text ↑
e5

“the lowest ones (0.85 and 0.93) were recorded by applying the treatment of mineral fertilizers+ 60% of ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1756 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different irrigation levels and fertilizers significantly affected vegetative growth and yield traits of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different irrigation water levels and fertilizerse6
Outcome
vegetative growth and yield traitse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e6

“Applying different irrigation water levels and fertilizers significantly affected the vegetative growth and yield traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–923 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different irrigation levels and fertilizers significantly affected lettuce nutrient contents and total soluble solids.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different irrigation water levels and fertilizerse6
Outcome
nutrient contents (N, P and K) and total soluble solids (TSS)e7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional status of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–665 · show in text ↑
e6

“Applying different irrigation water levels and fertilizers significantly affected the vegetative growth and yield traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–923 · show in text ↑
e7

“as well as nutrient contents (N, P and K) and total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1072 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 32 positive, 25 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 213 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.