Paper · 2019 · Pure and Applied Biology

Effect of various Bee wax concentrations on the organoleptic test of sweet orange cv.Valencia late

Kaleemullah; Muhammad Sajid; Zia Ulhaq; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to determine the "Effect of bee wax levels on the organoleptic test of sweet orange fruits cv. Valencia late" was conducted at Post Harvest Laboratory, The University of Agriculture Peshawar in 2014. The experiment was Completely Randomized Designed (CRD) with two factors repeated three times. The Bee wax levels (control, 2, 4, 6 and 8%) were applied to sweet orange fruits, stored at room temperature (161C with relative humidity of 60-70%) for 40 days. After each 10 days of intervals sweet orange fruits were analyzed for different sensory evolution attributes. The highest color score (6.17), aroma score (8.15), taste score (6.85), fruit appearance score (8.33) and texture score (7.14). There was a significant variation in all coated and uncoated fruits with the different storage durations. While minimum color (5.09), aroma (6.28), taste (1.73), appearance (2.80) and texture (1.73) were recorded. Interactive effect of both bee wax and storage intervals had a significant effect on all quality parameters. The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days. However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively. It was concluded that bee wax at 8% considerably maintained the quality parameters of sweet orange up to 30 days of storage at room condition (161C with relative humidity of 60-70%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated and uncoated sweet orange fruits differed significantly in sensory quality across storage durations.

Treatment
coated and uncoated fruitse0
Outcome
significant variatione0
Comparator
different storage durationse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant variation in all coated and uncoated fruits with the different storage durations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–831 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee wax and storage interval interacted significantly for all quality parameters.

Treatment
bee wax and storage intervalse0
Outcome
all quality parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interactive effect of both bee wax and storage intervals had a significant effect on all quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days had a maximum fruit color score of 5.29.

Treatment
8% bee waxe0
Outcome
fruit color scoree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.29e0
Qualifier
stored for 40 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days had a maximum taste score of 2.37.

Treatment
8% bee waxe0
Outcome
taste scoree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.37e0
Qualifier
stored for 40 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days had a maximum aroma score of 6.42.

Treatment
8% bee waxe0
Outcome
aroma scoree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.42e0
Qualifier
stored for 40 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days had a maximum fruit appearance score of 3.75.

Treatment
8% bee waxe0
Outcome
fruit appearance scoree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.75e0
Qualifier
stored for 40 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days had a maximum texture score of 2.60.

Treatment
8% bee waxe0
Outcome
texture scoree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.60e0
Qualifier
stored for 40 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit color score (5.29), taste score (2.37), aroma score (6.42), fruit appearance score (3.75) and texture score (2.60) was recorded in fruit treated with 8% bee wax and stored for 40 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruits had a minimum fruit color of 4.84.

Treatment
untreated fruitse0
Outcome
fruit colore0
Direction
minimume0
Value
4.84e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruits had a minimum taste of 1.26.

Treatment
untreated fruitse0
Outcome
tastee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.26e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruits had a minimum aroma of 6.14.

Treatment
untreated fruitse0
Outcome
aromae0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.14e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruits had a minimum appearance of 1.81.

Treatment
untreated fruitse0
Outcome
appearancee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.81e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruits had a minimum texture of 1.14.

Treatment
untreated fruitse0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.14e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However the minimum fruit color (4.84), taste (1.26), aroma (6.14), appearance (1.81) and texture (1.14) was observed in untreated fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1404 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 8% bee wax maintained sweet orange quality for up to 30 days at room conditions.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
bee wax at 8%e0
Outcome
maintained the quality parameterse0
Qualifier
up to 30 days of storage at room condition (161C with relative humidity of 60-70%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bee wax at 8% considerably maintained the quality parameters of sweet orange up to 30 days of storage at room condition (161C with relative humidity of 60-70%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1587 · show in text ↑