Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology

Effects of Chlorophyll Contents of Greengram Varieties /Lines as Influenced by Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita

Ritu Kumari Padey; D. K. Nayak; Rajesh Kumar Kar

13
claims
48
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A study was undertaken in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek] varieties to assess biochemical changes of resistant and susceptible cultivars due to the root-knot nematode infection. The changes in nutrient profile in plants inoculated with nematodes caused reduction in chlorophyll contents. Chlorophyll ‘a’ was maximum decreased (96.36%) in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14 followed by 93.98% in susceptible check variety 28 PM 10-12 but increasing trend was observed from 7.31 to 28.30% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively. Chlorophyll ‘b’ was maximum decreased (61.81%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672 followed by 53.33% in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14 but increasing trend was observed from 3.031to 76.66% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively. Total chlorophyll was maximum decreased (54.92%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672 followed by 32.79% in susceptible check variety 28PM10-12 but increasing trend was observed from 6.031 to 86.27% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infection reduced greengram chlorophyll content overall.

Treatment
inoculated with nematodese0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The changes in nutrient profile in plants inoculated with nematodes caused reduction in chlorophyll contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a decreased 96.36% in 7GGG 10-14.

Material
7GGG 10-14e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘a’e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
96.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll ‘a’ was maximum decreased (96.36%) in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a decreased 93.98% in 28 PM 10-12.

Material
28 PM 10-12e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘a’e1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
93.98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 93.98% in susceptible check variety 28 PM 10-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘a’ was maximum decreased (96.36%) in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a increased 7.31% in 24ML-233.

Material
24ML-233e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘a’e1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
7.31e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 7.31 to 28.30% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘a’ was maximum decreased (96.36%) in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a increased 28.30% in 17 IPM 9901-6.

Material
17 IPM 9901-6e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘a’e1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
28.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 7.31 to 28.30% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘a’ was maximum decreased (96.36%) in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b decreased 61.81% in 29 PUSA-0672.

Material
29 PUSA-0672e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘b’e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
61.81%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll ‘b’ was maximum decreased (61.81%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b decreased 53.33% in 7GGG 10-14.

Material
7GGG 10-14e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘b’e1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
53.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 53.33% in resistant check variety 7GGG 10-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘b’ was maximum decreased (61.81%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b increased 3.031% in 24ML-233.

Material
24ML-233e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘b’e1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
3.031e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 3.031to 76.66% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘b’ was maximum decreased (61.81%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b increased 76.66% in 17 IPM 9901-6.

Material
17 IPM 9901-6e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Chlorophyll ‘b’e1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
76.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 3.031to 76.66% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll ‘b’ was maximum decreased (61.81%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll decreased 54.92% in 29 PUSA-0672.

Material
29 PUSA-0672e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
54.92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll was maximum decreased (54.92%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll decreased 32.79% in 28PM10-12.

Material
28PM10-12e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Total chlorophylle1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
32.79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 32.79% in susceptible check variety 28PM10-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total chlorophyll was maximum decreased (54.92%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll increased 6.031% in 24ML-233.

Material
24ML-233e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Total chlorophylle1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
6.031e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 6.031 to 86.27% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total chlorophyll was maximum decreased (54.92%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll increased 86.27% in 17 IPM 9901-6.

Material
17 IPM 9901-6e0
Treatment
Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognitat1
Outcome
Total chlorophylle1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
86.27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing trend was observed from 6.031 to 86.27% in 24ML-233 and 17 IPM 9901-6 varieties respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total chlorophyll was maximum decreased (54.92%) in susceptible check variety 29 PUSA-0672”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–892 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Nematoda · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.