Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Interaction of pigeonpea cyst nematode Heterodera cajani and Macrophomina phaseolina on greengram (Vigna radiata)

M. Zareenaa Begum; Muttucumaru Sivakumar

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Investigations were carried out on the root-rot disease complex induced by the pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani and the root-rot fungus Macrophomina phaseolina to know their interaction effects of H. cajani a week prior to the inoculation of M. phaseolina caused highest root-rot incidence and significant reduction in plant growth and yield. Nematode multiplication was adversely affected when fungus inoculation was preceded by nematode inoculation. Pathogenicity studies of nematode and fungus revealed highest root-rot incidence and lowest pod yield at highest inoculum levels of nematode and fungus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation one week before fungus caused highest root rot incidence.

Treatment
H. cajani a week prior to the inoculation of M. phaseolinae0
Interactor
H. cajaniHeterodera cajanie0pathogen
Second interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
root-rot incidencee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · Second interactorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H. cajani a week prior to the inoculation of M. phaseolina caused highest root-rot incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This inoculation sequence significantly reduced growth and yield.

Treatment
H. cajani a week prior to the inoculation of M. phaseolinae0
Interactor
H. cajaniHeterodera cajanie0pathogen
Second interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · Second interactorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H. cajani a week prior to the inoculation of M. phaseolina caused highest root-rot incidence and significant reduction in plant growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode multiplication was adversely affected when its inoculation preceded fungus.

Treatment
fungus inoculation was preceded by nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Heterodera cajaniHeterodera cajanit1pathogen
Outcome
Nematode multiplicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode multiplication was adversely affected when fungus inoculation was preceded by nematode inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“Heterodera cajani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest inoculum levels gave highest root rot incidence.

Treatment
highest inoculum levels of nematode and funguse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Second interactor
funguse0pathogen
Outcome
root-rot incidencee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest root-rot incidence and lowest pod yield at highest inoculum levels of nematode and fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest inoculum levels gave lowest pod yield.

Treatment
highest inoculum levels of nematode and funguse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Second interactor
funguse0pathogen
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest root-rot incidence and lowest pod yield at highest inoculum levels of nematode and fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑

Macrophomina phaseolina · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Macrophomina phaseolina · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Nematoda · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 179 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.