Paper · 2015 · Pure and Applied Biology

Interactive Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur on Growth, Dry Matter Partitioning and Yield of Maize

Aman ullah

12
claims
33
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) are important crop nutrients limiting the crop growth and yield. In order to study N and S effect on growth, dry mater partitioning and grain yield of maize, a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011, which was designed in randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated thrice. Growth, dry matter partitioning, yield & yield components, and harvest index responded positively to N and S fertilization, but the magnitude of response varied with level of N and S application. Days to tasseling, silking and physiological maturity delayed, plant height and mean single leaf area increased with increase in N and S levels. Similarly, dry matter partitioning in stem, leaf, ear, and grains was increased with an increase in N and S levels and decreased in the control plots. The heaviest thousand grains weight was obtained when both N and S were applied at the highest rates. The highest grain yield viz., 3122 kg ha -1 was obtained in the plots where N was applied @ 160 kg ha -1 , while minimum grain yield i.e. 2039 kg ha -1 was obtained in control plots. Grain yield increased to maximum (2882 kg ha -1 ) when S was applied @ 40 kg ha -1 , and the lowest grain yield (2458 kg ha -1 ) was recorded in control plots. The harvest index ranked first when both N (27.8%) and S (27.7%) were applied at the highest rates of 160 kg N and 40 kg S ha -1 . Harvest index showed positive relationship with the increase in grain yield and yield components in maize. The results indicated that all the three levels of N and two levels of S increased the yield components and grain yields as well as harvest index in maize, and increased with an increase in N and S levels when compared with the control (N and S not). It is therefore, suggested that application of the highest S @ 40 kg S ha -1 and N levels @ 160 kg N ha -1 could increase maize productivity in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth, dry matter partitioning and yield components responded positively to N and S fertilization, with the magnitude of response varying with N and S level.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N and S fertilizatione1
Outcome
Growth, dry matter partitioning, yield & yield componentse1
Direction
responded positivelye1
Qualifier
the magnitude of response varied with level of N and S applicatione1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth, dry matter partitioning, yield & yield components, and harvest index responded positively to N and S fertilization, but the magnitude of response varied with level of N and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index responded positively to N and S fertilization.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N and S fertilizatione1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
responded positivelye1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth, dry matter partitioning, yield & yield components, and harvest index responded positively to N and S fertilization, but the magnitude of response varied with level of N and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days to tasseling, silking and physiological maturity were delayed with increasing N and S levels.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increase in N and S levelse2
Outcome
Days to tasseling, silking and physiological maturitye2
Direction
delayede2
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to tasseling, silking and physiological maturity delayed, plant height and mean single leaf area increased with increase in N and S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–767 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and mean single leaf area increased with increasing N and S levels.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increase in N and S levelse2
Outcome
plant height and mean single leaf areae2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to tasseling, silking and physiological maturity delayed, plant height and mean single leaf area increased with increase in N and S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter partitioning in stem, leaf, ear and grains increased with increasing N and S levels and decreased in control plots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
stem, leaf, ear, and grainse3
Treatment
increase in N and S levelse3
Outcome
dry matter partitioninge3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
control plotse3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e3

“dry matter partitioning in stem, leaf, ear, and grains was increased with an increase in N and S levels and decreased in the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grains weight was heaviest when both N and S were applied at the highest rates.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
both N and S were applied at the highest ratese4
Outcome
thousand grains weighte4
Direction
heavieste4
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e4

“The heaviest thousand grains weight was obtained when both N and S were applied at the highest rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was highest, at 3122 kg ha -1, where N was applied at 160 kg ha -1, compared with control plots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N was applied @ 160 kg ha -1e5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
3122 kg ha -1e5
Comparator
control plotse5
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest grain yield viz., 3122 kg ha -1 was obtained in the plots where N was applied @ 160 kg ha -1 , while minimum grain yield i.e. 2039 kg ha -1 was obtained in control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased to a maximum of 2882 kg ha -1 when S was applied at 40 kg ha -1, compared with control plots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
S was applied @ 40 kg ha -1e6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
increased to maximume6
Value
2882 kg ha -1e6
Comparator
control plotse6
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain yield increased to maximum (2882 kg ha -1 ) when S was applied @ 40 kg ha -1 , and the lowest grain yield (2458 kg ha -1 ) was recorded in control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index ranked first when both N and S were applied at the highest rates of 160 kg N and 40 kg S ha -1, at 27.8% (S 27.7%).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
applied at the highest rates of 160 kg N and 40 kg S ha -1e7
Outcome
harvest indexe7
Direction
ranked firste7
Value
27.8%e7
Qualifier
S (27.7%)e7
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e7

“The harvest index ranked first when both N (27.8%) and S (27.7%) were applied at the highest rates of 160 kg N and 40 kg S ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1493 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index showed a positive relationship with the increase in grain yield and yield components in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increase in grain yield and yield componentse1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“Harvest index showed positive relationship with the increase in grain yield and yield components in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three N levels and two S levels increased yield components, grain yield and harvest index compared with the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
all the three levels of N and two levels of Se1
Outcome
yield components and grain yields as well as harvest indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control (N and S not)e2
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was conducted at the New Developmental Research Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar during summer 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the three levels of N and two levels of S increased the yield components and grain yields as well as harvest index in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1757 · show in text ↑
e2

“when compared with the control (N and S not)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1852 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying the highest S at 40 kg S ha -1 and N at 160 kg N ha -1 could increase maize productivity in the study area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of the highest S @ 40 kg S ha -1 and N levels @ 160 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
maize productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the highest S @ 40 kg S ha -1 and N levels @ 160 kg N ha -1 could increase maize productivity in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–2012 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.