Paper · 2021 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Biological Series

Photosynthetic pigments content and parameters of oxidative stress in the amaranth species with increasing water deficiency

L. F. Kabashnikova; I. N. Domanskaya; T. S. Pilipovich; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The dynamics of the photosynthetic pigments content and parameters of oxidative stress with an increasing water deficit in the leaves of 40-days-old plants of two amaranth species - Amaranthus paniculatus L. (cv. Rubin) and Amaranthus caudatus L. (cv. Chyrvony aksamit), grown in a pot culture, was studied. Specific features of the development of water deficiency in amaranth leaves were revealed: amaranth plants Amaranthus paniculatus L. showed a stronger development of water deficit in leaves than Amaranthus caudatus L. after 4-days soil drought, which after 8 days increased in two species to 73.7 and 55.7 %, respectively. Under moderate drought, the amount of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoids) based on dry leaf weight increased in two amaranth species, but after 8 days of soil drought, the content of Chl ( a + b ) was reduced by 2.0-2.1 times, and carotenoids - 1.8-1.9 times relative to the physiological level. As a result of a 4-days soil drought in the leaves of Amaranthus paniculatus L., there was a significant decrease in the content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activity of lipid peroxidation (LPO), while in Amaranthus caudatus L. an increase in the levels of ROS and LPO was observed. With an increase in the pressure of the stress factor in the leaves of amaranth of the two studied species, a decrease in the ROS content and LPO activity relative to physiological values was revealed. A conclusion was made about the different mechanisms of ROS generation and the flow of LPO processes at different stages of soil drought in the leaves of different amaranth species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four days drought, A. paniculatus developed stronger leaf water deficit than A. caudatus.

Taxon
Amaranthus paniculatus L.Amaranthus paniculatuse0
Outcome
water deficit in leavese0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
after 4-days soil droughte0
Comparator
Amaranthus caudatus L.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus paniculatus
Amaranthus paniculatus · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus paniculatus L. showed a stronger development of water deficit in leaves than Amaranthus caudatus L. after 4-days soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight days, A. paniculatus leaf water deficit reached 73.7%.

Taxon
Amaranthus paniculatus L.Amaranthus paniculatuse1
Outcome
water deficit in leavese1
Direction
increasede0
Value
73.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus paniculatus
Amaranthus paniculatus · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 8 days increased in two species to 73.7 and 55.7 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“amaranth plants Amaranthus paniculatus L. showed a stronger development of water deficit in leaves than Amaranthus caudatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight days, A. caudatus leaf water deficit reached 55.7%.

Taxon
Amaranthus caudatus L.Amaranthus caudatuse1
Outcome
increasede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 8 days increased in two species to 73.7 and 55.7 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus caudatus L. (cv. Chyrvony aksamit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought increased chlorophyll and carotenoids in both species.

Outcome
photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoids)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under moderate drought, the amount of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoids) based on dry leaf weight increased in two amaranth species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days drought reduced chlorophyll content by 2.0-2.1 times.

Outcome
content of Chl ( a + b )e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.0-2.1 timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 8 days of soil drought, the content of Chl ( a + b ) was reduced by 2.0-2.1 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“in two amaranth species, but after 8 days of soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days drought reduced carotenoids by 1.8-1.9 times.

Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.8-1.9 timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoids - 1.8-1.9 times relative to the physiological level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“after 8 days of soil drought, the content of Chl ( a + b ) was reduced by 2.0-2.1 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“amaranth species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four days drought decreased ROS content and LPO activity in A. paniculatus.

Taxon
Amaranthus paniculatus L.Amaranthus paniculatuse0
Outcome
content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activity of lipid peroxidation (LPO)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus paniculatus
Amaranthus paniculatus · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the leaves of Amaranthus paniculatus L., there was a significant decrease in the content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activity of lipid peroxidation (LPO)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four days drought increased ROS and LPO in A. caudatus.

Taxon
Amaranthus caudatus L.Amaranthus caudatuse0
Outcome
levels of ROS and LPOe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Amaranthus caudatus L. an increase in the levels of ROS and LPO was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater stress reduced ROS content and LPO activity in both amaranth species.

Outcome
ROS content and LPO activitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
physiological valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the leaves of amaranth of the two studied species, a decrease in the ROS content and LPO activity relative to physiological values was revealed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1446 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer different ROS generation and LPO mechanisms across drought stages and species.

Outcome
ROS generation and the flow of LPO processese0
Qualifier
different mechanismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different mechanisms of ROS generation and the flow of LPO processes at different stages of soil drought in the leaves of different amaranth species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1628 · show in text ↑