Abstract
During 2 seasons, defoliated and non-defoliated strawberry plants were evaluated for their fruiting response using the annual hill cultural system in Dover, FL. Partially dormant Canadian grown `Chandler' and non-dormant locally grown FL breeding line 79-1126 were grown the first season. Locally grown `Dover' was added the second season. Total yields of all clones were reduced with foliage removed. Monthly yields were reduced the first season with FL 79-1126 defoliated plants, but only the April yield of defoliated `Chandler' was reduced. December, January, March, and total yields of defoliated plants from all clones were reduced the second season. Average seasonal fruit weight was reduced the second season with locally grown defoliated plants. During the second season the percent marketable fruit of `Chandler' and FL 79-1126 was greater with the defoliated plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Removing foliage reduced total yield in every tested strawberry clone.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Material
- all clonese0
- Treatment
- foliage removede0
- Outcome
- Total yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Total yields of all clones were reduced with foliage removed.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced monthly yield of FL 79-1126 in the first season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- FL 79-1126e0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- Monthly yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- the first seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Monthly yields were reduced the first season with FL 79-1126 defoliated plants”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced Chandler yield only in April in the first season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- `Chandler'e0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- April yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“only the April yield of defoliated `Chandler' was reduced.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced December, January and March yields across clones in the second season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- all clonese0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- December, January, Marche0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- the second seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“December, January, March, and total yields of defoliated plants from all clones were reduced the second season.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced total yield across clones in the second season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- all clonese0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- total yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- the second seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total yields of defoliated plants from all clones were reduced the second season.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced average seasonal fruit weight in locally grown plants in the second season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- Average seasonal fruit weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- the second seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average seasonal fruit weight was reduced the second season with locally grown defoliated plants.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation increased marketable fruit percentage of Chandler in the second season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- `Chandler'e0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- percent marketable fruite0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- second seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“During the second season the percent marketable fruit of `Chandler' and FL 79-1126 was greater with the defoliated plants.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation increased marketable fruit percentage of FL 79-1126 in the second season.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Material
- FL 79-1126e0
- Treatment
- defoliatede0
- Outcome
- percent marketable fruite0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- second seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“During the second season the percent marketable fruit of `Chandler' and FL 79-1126 was greater with the defoliated plants.”
t0“THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →pruning · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.