pruning · Yield · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)
29 claims from these papers; 4 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Training Systems for Second-year Production of Fall-planted Strawberries (1987)
no changeMowing did not affect matted-row yield.
THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE (1990)decreaseFirst-season defoliation reduced monthly yields of FL 79-1126.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Influence of Defoliation at Transplanting on Strawberry Growth and Fruiting Response1 (1972)
decreaseDefoliation at transplanting reduced strawberry yield.
Effects of Mechanical Harvest and Defoliation on Subsequent Performance of Three Strawberry Cultivars1 (1982)no changeDefoliation by mechanical harvest did not adversely affect subsequent plant growth and yield of strawberry.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE (1990)
decreaseFirst-season defoliation reduced monthly yields of FL 79-1126.
Effects of Mechanical Harvest and Defoliation on Subsequent Performance of Three Strawberry Cultivars1 (1982)no changeDefoliation by mechanical harvest did not adversely affect subsequent plant growth and yield of strawberry.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
4 citations between these papers: 0 on the same side, 4 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
Effect of Planting Date and Defoliation on Three Strawberry Cultivars · 1985
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 13
Influence of Defoliation at Transplanting on Strawberry Growth and Fruiting Response1 · 1972
- negative
- no effect
Training Systems for Second-year Production of Fall-planted Strawberries · 1987
- no effect
THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE · 1990
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
THE EFFECT OF DEFOLIATION ON STRAWBERRY FRUITING RESPONSE · 1990
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A Revolution in New England: New Hampshire Develops an Annual Strawberry Production System · 1998
- no effect
A Revolution in New England: New Hampshire Develops an Annual Strawberry Production System · 1998
- no effect
577 Strawberry Runner Plant Root Pruning and Subsequent Growth and Yield in California · 1999
- no effect
- no effect
Severe Root Pruning of Strawberry Bare Root Transplants Is Yield Neutral · 2002
- no effect
- negative
Pruning inflorescences reduces the yield of neutral-day strawberry cultivars · 2024
- negative
- negative
- negative
Early Prediction of Fruit Size Based on Flower Characteristics of Strawberry · 2026
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.