Abstract
In Japan, wholesale prices of strawberries fluctuate markedly, making the timing of peak harvest with periods of high market value a critical issue. Consequently, there is a strong demand for technologies that enable harvest control. We aimed to achieve harvest control with fruit maturation management using environmental control. Harvest control requires accurate prediction of fruit yield, which predicts fruit size and harvest date. In this study, we focused on predicting fruit size. To construct an early prediction model of fruit size as the foundation for harvest control decisions, we attempted predictions using only floral and environmental parameters available at the time of flowering. From the collected parameters, variable selection based on the variance inflation factor was performed to mitigate the effects of multicollinearity. To avoid overfitting, a 4-fold cross-validation was applied, and a multiple regression model was constructed to predict fruit weight. As a result of variable selection, six parameters were selected as explanatory variables: flowering order within the inflorescence, receptacle area, pedicel diameter, flowering day, average air temperature, and direction of inflorescence. The multiple regression model achieved an R2 of 0.775. Additionally, the feasibility of substituting future temperature data with historical data or target set-point temperatures was demonstrated. Furthermore, a flower thinning experiment showed that the influence of post-flowering source–sink balance on fruit size was minimal, indicating that it does not need to be incorporated into the model. These results demonstrate that fruit size can be predicted with reasonable accuracy using data available at flowering, and will play an important role in early yield prediction systems that will be developed in the future.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The multiple regression model for strawberry fruit weight reached R2 0.775.
- Taxon
- strawberries
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Outcome
- R2e1
- Value
- 0.775e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“wholesale prices of strawberries fluctuate markedly”
e1“The multiple regression model achieved an R2 of 0.775”
Claim · model-written summary
Substituting future temperature data with historical data or target set-point temperatures was feasible for the strawberry fruit size model.
- Taxon
- strawberries
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Outcome
- feasibility of substituting future temperature datae2
- Comparator
- historical data or target set-point temperaturese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“wholesale prices of strawberries fluctuate markedly”
e2“the feasibility of substituting future temperature data with historical data or target set-point temperatures was demonstrated”
Claim · model-written summary
In a flower thinning experiment on strawberry, the influence of post-flowering source-sink balance on fruit size was minimal.
- Taxon
- strawberries
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- flower thinninge3
- Outcome
- influence of post-flowering source–sink balance on fruit sizee3
- Direction
- minimale3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“wholesale prices of strawberries fluctuate markedly”
e3“a flower thinning experiment showed that the influence of post-flowering source–sink balance on fruit size was minimal”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.