Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Planting Methods and Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Paddy (Oryza sativa L.)

Boddu Krupa Blessy Angel; Shikha Singh

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The trial was conducted at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy of Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P), during Kharif 2021.The experiment was bifactorial (two factors) which consists of three different planting methods i.e., Direct seeded rice, Transplanted rice and SRI method, and three different weed management practices i.e., Hand weeding (twice), Oxadiazon 25 EC (as Pre emergence) at 250g/L (2L/ha) and Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20g/ha (as Post Emergence) and a control plot laid out in randomized block design with ten different treatment combinations which is replicated thrice. The results revealed that at harvest significantly, higher growth attributes like plant height (117.28 cm), Number of tillers (38), plant dry weight (56.36 g/hill) at harvest is recorded in treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice at critical crop weed competition. Significantly, higher yield attributes like number of effective tillers/ hill (35), number of panicles/ plant (44), number of grains per panicle (216.6), test weight (25 g), grain yield (5.1 t/ha) and straw yield (8.1 t/ha) was highest in the same treatment. From the experiment it can be concluded that treatment 7 where SRI method of planting and hand weeding twice during critical crop weed competition was considered as best treatment combination with maximum effective tillers/hill, number of panicles/plant, number of grains per panicle, test weight, grain yield and straw yield i.e., all the yield attributes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave significantly higher plant height (117.28 cm) at harvest.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
117.28 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher growth attributes like plant height (117.28 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher number of tillers (38) at harvest.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
Number of tillerse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
38e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Number of tillers (38)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher plant dry weight (56.36 g/hill) at harvest.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
56.36 g/hille0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant dry weight (56.36 g/hill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher number of effective tillers per hill (35).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
number of effective tillers/ hille0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
35e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of effective tillers/ hill (35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher number of panicles per plant (44).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
number of panicles/ plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
44e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of panicles/ plant (44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher number of grains per panicle (216.6).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
number of grains per paniclee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
216.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of grains per panicle (216.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher test weight (25 g).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
25 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“test weight (25 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher grain yield (5.1 t/ha).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
5.1 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (5.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting with hand weeding twice gave a higher straw yield (8.1 t/ha).

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
8.1 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (8.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment number 7 with a combination of SRI method of planting and Hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that SRI planting with hand weeding twice during critical crop-weed competition was the best treatment combination.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Outcome
best treatment combinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“treatment 7 where SRI method of planting and hand weeding twice during critical crop weed competition was considered as best treatment combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

123 papers: 92 positive, 31 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

herbicide · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.