Abstract
The investigation was carried out to study the efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in up taking plant nutrients for the Piper mullesua Piper mullesua plantlets grown in acidic soil condition. In the present study, seedlings were infected with ten different strains of AM fungi and one without inoculation of AM fungi under controlled soil pH (4.5). Growth parameters and plant nutrients of AM infected plants were higher than those of non-mycorrhizal controls, which confirm the contribution of AM fungi. The two mycorrhizal fungal species G. macrocarpum and were most efficient in pH 4.5 and encouraged the growth of the plantlets . The correlation coefficient between plant G. hoi P. mullesua biomass and phosphatase activity was highly significant in case of associated with plantelts under acidic soil G. macrocarpum P. mullesuacondition which confirms potentiality of the fungal inoculums in acidic soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal Piper plantlets had higher growth parameters than non-mycorrhizal controls.
- Taxon
- Piper mullesua
Piper mullesuat0 - Treatment
- AM infected plantse0
- Interactor
- AMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- Growth parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth parameters and plant nutrients of AM infected plants were higher than those of non-mycorrhizal controls”
t0“Piper mullesua”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal Piper plantlets had higher plant nutrients than non-mycorrhizal controls.
- Taxon
- Piper mullesuaPiper mullesuat0
- Treatment
- AM infected plantse0
- Interactor
- AMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant nutrientse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth parameters and plant nutrients of AM infected plants were higher than those of non-mycorrhizal controls”
t0“Piper mullesua”
Claim · model-written summary
G. macrocarpum encouraged Piper plantlet growth at pH 4.5.
- Taxon
- Piper mullesuaPiper mullesuat0
- Treatment
- G. macrocarpume0
- Interactor
- G. macrocarpume0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth of the plantletse0
- Direction
- encouragede0
- Qualifier
- pH 4.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. macrocarpum and were most efficient in pH 4.5 and encouraged the growth of the plantlets”
t0“Piper mullesua”
Claim · model-written summary
Piper biomass correlated significantly with phosphatase activity under G. macrocarpum association.
- Taxon
- Piper mullesuaPiper mullesuat0
- Interactor
- G. macrocarpume0symbiont
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Qualifier
- phosphatase activitye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biomass and phosphatase activity was highly significant in case of associated with plantelts under acidic soil G. macrocarpum”
t0“Piper mullesua”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · growth · Piper mullesuaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.