Paper · 2022 · Ciência Rural

Physical and physiological qualities and productivity of corn seeds fertilized with poultry waste

Jussara Aparecida Santos de Macedo; Eduardo Fontes Araújo; Roberto Fontes Araújo; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the physical and physiological qualities and productivity of corn seeds, a variety UFVM 100 Native, produced in plots fertilized in top dressing with different levels of poultry waste. The experiment was organized in a randomized block design, with six treatments and four repetitions, totaling 24 plots. The treatments consisted of the application of 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste. The seeds were subjected to the following evaluations: uniformity test, thousand seed weight, germination, vigor (first germination count, accelerated aging, soilless cold test, percentage, and emergence rate in sand), and productivity. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the effects of different dosages of poultry waste on the variables considered. The quality of seeds was not influenced by the effects of different levels of fertilization. Among the dosages used, 7.5 t/ha is recommended because it provides a greater increase in productivity, which may result in a greater financial return to the producer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different levels of poultry-waste fertilization did not influence corn seed quality.

Material
UFVM 100 Nativee4
Treatment
different levels of fertilizatione1
Outcome
quality of seedse1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn seeds fertilized with poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The quality of seeds was not influenced by the effects of different levels of fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–900 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments consisted of the application of 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–444 · show in text ↑
e4

“a variety UFVM 100 Native”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

7.5 t/ha of poultry waste is recommended among the dosages used.

Outcome
7.5 t/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn seeds fertilized with poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the dosages used, 7.5 t/ha is recommended because it provides a greater increase in productivity, which may result in a greater financial return to the producer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste gave a greater increase in productivity than the other dosages used.

Treatment
7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry wastee3
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
greater increasee2
Comparator
dosages usede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn seeds fertilized with poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the dosages used, 7.5 t/ha is recommended because it provides a greater increase in productivity, which may result in a greater financial return to the producer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments consisted of the application of 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste may result in a greater financial return to the producer.

Treatment
7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry wastee3
Outcome
financial return to the producere2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
dosages usede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn seeds fertilized with poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the dosages used, 7.5 t/ha is recommended because it provides a greater increase in productivity, which may result in a greater financial return to the producer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments consisted of the application of 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 t/ha of tanned poultry waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–444 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.