Paper · 2022 · Plants

Foliar Application of Nano-Silicon Improves the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of ‘Kalamata’ Olive Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in a Semi-Arid Climate

Islam F. Hassan; Rahaf Ajaj; Maybelle S. Gaballah; et al.

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
61
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Egypt’s arid and semi-arid lands where the main olive production zone is located, evapotranspiration is higher than rainfall during winter. Limited research has used nanomaterials, especially nano-silicon (nSi) to improve the growth, development, and productivity of drought-stressed fruit trees, amid the global water scarcity problem. To assess the role of nSi on drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth, and biochemical and physiological changes under drought conditions, a split-plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design. The trees were foliar sprayed with nSi in the field using nine treatments (three replicates each) of 0, 150, and 200 mg·L−1 under different irrigation regimes (100, 90, and 80% irrigation water requirements ‘IWR’) during the 2020 and 2021 seasons. Drought negatively affected the trees, but both concentrations of nSi alleviated drought effects at reduced irrigation levels, compared to the non-stressed trees. Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight and reduced fruit drop percentage, compared to 80% IWR. In addition, there were reduced levels of osmoprotectants such as proline, soluble sugars, and abscisic acid (ABA) with less membrane damage expressed as reduced levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2 and electrolyte leakage at 90% compared to 80% IWR. These results suggest that ‘Kalamata’ olive trees were severely stressed at 80% compared to 90% IWR, which was not surprising as it is classified as drought sensitive. Overall, the application of 200 mg·L−1 nSi was beneficial for the improvement of the mechanical resistance, growth, and productivity of moderately-stressed (90% IWR) ‘Kalamata’ olive trees under the Egyptian semi-arid conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought negatively affected Kalamata olive trees.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
treese1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought negatively affected the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both nano-silicon concentrations alleviated drought effects on Kalamata olive trees at reduced irrigation levels compared with non-stressed trees.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
nSie2
Outcome
drought effectse2
Direction
alleviatede2
Comparator
non-stressed treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e2

“both concentrations of nSi alleviated drought effects at reduced irrigation levels, compared to the non-stressed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-silicon at 90% IWR improved yield and fruit weight of Kalamata olive trees compared with 80% IWR.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of droughte3
Outcome
yield and fruit weighte3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
80% IWRe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1100 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced fruit drop percentage, compared to 80% IWR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-silicon at 90% IWR reduced fruit drop percentage of Kalamata olive trees compared with 80% IWR.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of droughte3
Outcome
fruit drop percentagee4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
80% IWRe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1100 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced fruit drop percentage, compared to 80% IWR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90% IWR, Kalamata olive trees had reduced levels of osmoprotectants (proline, soluble sugars and ABA) compared with 80% IWR.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
90% IWRe3
Outcome
osmoprotectantse5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
proline, soluble sugars, and abscisic acid (ABA)e5
Comparator
80% IWRe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1100 · show in text ↑
e5

“reduced levels of osmoprotectants such as proline, soluble sugars, and abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1271 · show in text ↑
e6

“electrolyte leakage at 90% compared to 80% IWR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90% IWR, Kalamata olive trees had reduced malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2 and electrolyte leakage compared with 80% IWR.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
90% IWRe3
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2 and electrolyte leakagee7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
80% IWRe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1100 · show in text ↑
e6

“electrolyte leakage at 90% compared to 80% IWR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1407 · show in text ↑
e7

“reduced levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2 and electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 200 mg·L−1 nSi increased mechanical resistance, growth and productivity of moderately stressed Kalamata olive trees under Egyptian semi-arid conditions.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Kalamata’e0
Treatment
200 mg·L−1 nSie1
Outcome
mechanical resistance, growth, and productivitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Setting
Egyptian semi-arid conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-sensitive ‘Kalamata’ olive tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of 200 mg·L−1 nSi was beneficial for the improvement of the mechanical resistance, growth, and productivity of moderately-stressed (90% IWR) ‘Kalamata’ olive trees under the Egyptian semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1805 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.