Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt

Marwa El-Deriny; Eman Hammad

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nematodes are considered a severe agricultural concern. Meloidogyne nematodes can attack a wide range of plants, necessitating a variety of management techniques to reduce their population. The current study compared AGRN compost, VERMI compost in solid and tea shapes, and COMPOSTIVE compost to oxamyl as a chemical nematicide on cantaloupe (Cucumis melo var. cantalupensis) infected with root-knot nematode to determine its effect on cantaloupe growth under greenhouse and plastic house conditions. The results showed that all treatments improved plant growth parameters significantly in greenhouse settings. They also lowered the final population and rate of Meloidogyne incognita reproduction in soil and roots. The COMPOSTIVE compost and VERMI compost tea had the best effect on decreasing root-knot nematode population in the soil, number of galls, and egg masses on roots under plastic house conditions. In comparison to untreated plants, all treatments increased fruit weight. They also improved the fruit quality, with 12.7 % Total soluble solids (TSS), 3.90 mg/100ml total protein, and 15.31 mg/100ml total sugar after treatment with COMPOSTIVE compost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All compost treatments significantly improved cantaloupe growth parameters in greenhouse settings.

Treatment
all treatmentse1
Outcome
plant growth parameterse1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
greenhouse settingse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“all treatments improved plant growth parameters significantly in greenhouse settings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost treatments lowered the final population and reproduction rate of Meloidogyne incognita in soil and roots.

Treatment
AGRN compost, VERMI compost in solid and tea shapes, and COMPOSTIVE composte0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
final population and rate of Meloidogyne incognita reproduction in soil and rootse2
Direction
lowerede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“AGRN compost, VERMI compost in solid and tea shapes, and COMPOSTIVE compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–292 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowered the final population and rate of Meloidogyne incognita reproduction in soil and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMPOSTIVE compost and VERMI compost tea decreased root-knot nematode population in the soil, number of galls, and egg masses on roots under plastic house conditions.

Treatment
COMPOSTIVE compost and VERMI compost teae3
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee3pathogen
Outcome
root-knot nematode population in the soil, number of galls, and egg masses on rootse3
Direction
decreasinge3
Qualifier
best effecte3
Setting
plastic house conditionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“The COMPOSTIVE compost and VERMI compost tea had the best effect on decreasing root-knot nematode population in the soil, number of galls, and egg masses on roots under plastic house conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All compost treatments increased cantaloupe fruit weight compared with untreated plants.

Treatment
all treatmentse4
Outcome
fruit weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
untreated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“In comparison to untreated plants, all treatments increased fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMPOSTIVE compost improved fruit total soluble solids in cantaloupe to 12.7 %.

Treatment
COMPOSTIVE composte7
Outcome
Total soluble solids (TSS)e5
Direction
improvede5
Value
12.7 %e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“They also improved the fruit quality, with 12.7 % Total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1061 · show in text ↑
e7

“15.31 mg/100ml total sugar after treatment with COMPOSTIVE compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMPOSTIVE compost improved fruit total protein in cantaloupe to 3.90 mg/100ml.

Treatment
COMPOSTIVE composte7
Outcome
total proteine6
Direction
improvede5
Value
3.90 mg/100mle6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“They also improved the fruit quality, with 12.7 % Total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1061 · show in text ↑
e6

“3.90 mg/100ml total protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1090 · show in text ↑
e7

“15.31 mg/100ml total sugar after treatment with COMPOSTIVE compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMPOSTIVE compost improved fruit total sugar in cantaloupe to 15.31 mg/100ml.

Treatment
COMPOSTIVE composte7
Outcome
total sugare7
Direction
improvede5
Value
15.31 mg/100mle7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of Amended Composts for Biocontrol of Root-Knot Nematode Infected Cantaloupe, Cucumis melo Var. Cantalupensis in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“They also improved the fruit quality, with 12.7 % Total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1061 · show in text ↑
e7

“15.31 mg/100ml total sugar after treatment with COMPOSTIVE compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1162 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.