Paper · 2022 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Precrops and N-fertilizer impacts on soybean performance in tropical regions of Brazil

Anderson Hideo Yokoyama; Claudemir Zucareli; Antonio Eduardo Coelho; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Precrops have different growth patterns, nitrogen (N) requirements, and production of residues varying in amounts and quality that may affect the N-clycling and the soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) cropped in succession. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of precrops and N fertilization on soybean performance. An experiment was conducted in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil, with six precrops treatments: fallow, ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis), showy rattlebox (Crotalaria spectabilis), corn (Zea mays) without or with 80 kg ha−1 of N at topdressing as urea, and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Subplots consisted of two levels of N fertilization at soybean sowing: 0 and 30 kg ha−1 of N as ammonium nitrate at sowing. Urochloa ruziziensis as precrops increased the soybean yield (5,171 kg ha-1) when compared with corn (4,346 kg ha-1) and fallow (4,467 kg ha-1). In 2016/17, N fertilization of soybean with 30 kg ha−1 of N at sowing, although increasing the initial plant growth (745 kg ha-1 with vs. 662 kg ha-1 without), impairs nodulation (100 mg pl-1 with vs. 130 g pl-1 without) and does not increase grain yield. Oil and protein concentrations in soybean grains are not influenced by precrops and N fertilization at sowing. We found that the use Urochloa ruziziensis as cover crop in soybean precrops is a good recommendation option in tropical regions of Brazil, because increasing the yield of soybean grown in succession. N fertilization at in soybean sowing it should not be recommended even in the presence of a large amount of straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urochloa ruziziensis as precrop increased soybean yield compared with corn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Urochloa ruziziensis as precropse1
Outcome
soybean yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5,171 kg ha-1e1
Qualifier
4,346 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
corne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa ruziziensis as precrops increased the soybean yield (5,171 kg ha-1) when compared with corn (4,346 kg ha-1) and fallow (4,467 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urochloa ruziziensis as precrop increased soybean yield compared with fallow.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Urochloa ruziziensis as precropse1
Outcome
soybean yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5,171 kg ha-1e1
Qualifier
4,467 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
fallowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa ruziziensis as precrops increased the soybean yield (5,171 kg ha-1) when compared with corn (4,346 kg ha-1) and fallow (4,467 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization of soybean at sowing increased initial plant growth compared with no N fertilization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
N fertilization of soybeane2
Outcome
initial plant growthe3
Direction
increasinge3
Value
745 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
662 kg ha-1e3
Comparator
withoute3
Setting
2016/17e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–197 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2016/17, N fertilization of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–904 · show in text ↑
e3

“although increasing the initial plant growth (745 kg ha-1 with vs. 662 kg ha-1 without)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization of soybean at sowing impaired nodulation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
N fertilization of soybeane2
Outcome
nodulatione4
Direction
impairse4
Value
100 mg pl-1e4
Qualifier
130 g pl-1e4
Comparator
withoute4
Setting
2016/17e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–197 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2016/17, N fertilization of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–904 · show in text ↑
e4

“impairs nodulation (100 mg pl-1 with vs. 130 g pl-1 without)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization of soybean at sowing did not increase grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
N fertilization of soybeane2
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
does not increasee5
Setting
2016/17e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–197 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2016/17, N fertilization of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–904 · show in text ↑
e5

“does not increase grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil and protein concentrations in soybean grains were not influenced by precrops or N fertilization at sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
precrops and N fertilization at sowinge6
Outcome
Oil and protein concentrationse6
Direction
not influencede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Oil and protein concentrations in soybean grains are not influenced by precrops and N fertilization at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1231 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urochloa ruziziensis as cover crop in soybean precrops is a good recommendation in tropical Brazil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe7
Outcome
use Urochloa ruziziensis as cover crop in soybean precropse7
Setting
tropical regions of Brazile7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the use Urochloa ruziziensis as cover crop in soybean precrops is a good recommendation option in tropical regions of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1371 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization at soybean sowing should not be recommended, even with a large amount of straw.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
N fertilization at in soybean sowinge1
Qualifier
even in the presence of a large amount of strawe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“N fertilization at in soybean sowing it should not be recommended even in the presence of a large amount of straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1547 · show in text ↑

Urochloa ruziziensis · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 116 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

192 papers: 142 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

188 papers more in this group

See all 192 papers →

fertilization · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 359 positive, 59 negative or no effect

358 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.