Paper · 2022 · The 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology

Effect of Soil Practice on Photosynthesis, Yield and Quality of Soyabean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)

Jan Buczek; Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek

8
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The environmental factor determining the increase in soybean crops during the current climate changes is its adaptation to drought periods; therefore, in addition to conventional tillage (CT), no-till cultivation systems (RT, NT) are practiced in the cultivation of this species. A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland. The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin. The experimental factors were three tillage systems (conventional—CT, reduced—RT, no-tillage—NT). The use of CT and RT influenced the increase of LAI and SPAD and stimulated the course of the photosynthesis process, which resulted in an increase in the values of Fv/F0 and PI parameters compared to NT. Soybean with CT yielded significantly higher than with NT, and seeds contained more protein. Fat and P content was significantly higher in NT and K in seeds from RT. Under extremely dry and dry conditions (June–September), in 2017 the seed yield in NT was similar to CT and significantly higher than in RT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and reduced tillage increased LAI and SPAD in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Treatment
CT and RTe3
Outcome
LAI and SPADe3
Direction
increasee3
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e3

“The use of CT and RT influenced the increase of LAI and SPAD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and reduced tillage increased the values of Fv/F0 and PI parameters compared with no-tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Treatment
CT and RTe3
Outcome
Fv/F0 and PI parameterse5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
NTe5
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e3

“The use of CT and RT influenced the increase of LAI and SPAD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–546 · show in text ↑
e5

“which resulted in an increase in the values of Fv/F0 and PI parameters compared to NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean under conventional tillage yielded significantly higher than under no-tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
CTe6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
NTe6
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soybean with CT yielded significantly higher than with NT, and seeds contained more protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds under conventional tillage contained more protein than under no-tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe6
Organ / stage
seedse6
Treatment
CTe6
Outcome
proteine6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
NTe6
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soybean with CT yielded significantly higher than with NT, and seeds contained more protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fat and P content of soybean seeds was significantly higher under no-tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Treatment
NTe7
Outcome
Fat and P contente7
Direction
highere7
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fat and P content was significantly higher in NT and K in seeds from RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K content of soybean seeds was higher under reduced tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Organ / stage
seedse7
Treatment
RTe7
Outcome
Ke7
Direction
highere7
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fat and P content was significantly higher in NT and K in seeds from RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under extremely dry and dry conditions in 2017, seed yield under no-tillage was similar to conventional tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Treatment
NTe4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
similare4
Qualifier
Under extremely dry and dry conditions (June–September)e2
Comparator
CTe4
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e4

“in 2017 the seed yield in NT was similar to CT and significantly higher than in RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–996 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under extremely dry and dry conditions (June–September)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under extremely dry and dry conditions in 2017, seed yield under no-tillage was significantly higher than under reduced tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
cv. Merline1
Treatment
NTe4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
Under extremely dry and dry conditions (June–September)e2
Comparator
RTe4
Setting
Boguchwała, Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted in 2017–2019 in Boguchwała, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was soybean cv. Merlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–386 · show in text ↑
e4

“in 2017 the seed yield in NT was similar to CT and significantly higher than in RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–996 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under extremely dry and dry conditions (June–September)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–912 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.