Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Enhancing Zinc Biofortification of Wheat through Integration of Zinc, Compost, and Zinc-Solubilizing Bacteria

Shah Khalid; Amanullah; Iftikhar Ahmed

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency is a fairly widespread agronomic constraint in many of the world’s cereal (wheat, rice, corn, barley, etc.) production regions. Zinc is an imperative micronutrient required for optimum plant growth and development. Low Zn availability in about 50% of global land has resulted in Zn deficiency in cereal grains. A two-year field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, during Rabi season 2018–19 (Y1) and 2019–20 (Y2) to study the impact of Zn levels (0, 5, 10 and 15 kg Zn ha−1), compost types (control, composted sheep manure (SMC), composted poultry manure (PMC) and farmyard manure compost (FYMC), and Zn-solubilizing bacteria (ZnSB) (with (+) and without (-) on Zn biofortification in order to overcome Zn deficiency. The experiment was set up in three replications in a randomized complete block design. The wheat variety “Pirsabak-2013” was planted in a 30 cm row-to-row spacing. The plot size was kept at 9 cm2, with 10 rows plot−1, and the seed was sown at a rate of 100 kg ha−1. The results showed that ZnSB application increased ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration) to a maximum level of 29.3 mg kg−1, ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake) to 176.0 g ha−1, SZnUp (straw Zn uptake) to 116.67 g ha−1, and TZnUp (total Zn uptake) to 230.3 g ha−1. In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1). In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1. A strong positive correlation was found among uptake by different plant parts (ZnG, ZnS, ShZnUp, GZnUp, SZnUp, and TZnUp). It was concluded that the combined application of PMC and 10 kg Zn ha−1 along with ZnSB (+) improved Zn biofortification and uptake in wheat crop under Zn-deficient soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSB application increased shoot Zn concentration to a maximum of 29.3 mg kg−1.

Treatment
ZnSB applicatione1
Outcome
ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
29.3 mg kg−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSB application increased ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration) to a maximum level of 29.3 mg kg−1, ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake) to 176.0 g ha−1, SZnUp (straw Zn uptake) to 116.67 g ha−1, and TZnUp (total Zn uptake) to 230.3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSB application increased shoot Zn uptake to a maximum of 176.0 g ha−1.

Treatment
ZnSB applicatione1
Outcome
ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
176.0 g ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSB application increased ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration) to a maximum level of 29.3 mg kg−1, ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake) to 176.0 g ha−1, SZnUp (straw Zn uptake) to 116.67 g ha−1, and TZnUp (total Zn uptake) to 230.3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSB application increased straw Zn uptake to 116.67 g ha−1.

Treatment
ZnSB applicatione1
Outcome
SZnUp (straw Zn uptake)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
116.67 g ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSB application increased ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration) to a maximum level of 29.3 mg kg−1, ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake) to 176.0 g ha−1, SZnUp (straw Zn uptake) to 116.67 g ha−1, and TZnUp (total Zn uptake) to 230.3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSB application increased total Zn uptake to 230.3 g ha−1.

Treatment
ZnSB applicatione1
Outcome
TZnUp (total Zn uptake)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
230.3 g ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSB application increased ShZnC (shoot Zn concentration) to a maximum level of 29.3 mg kg−1, ShZnUp (shoot Zn uptake) to 176.0 g ha−1, SZnUp (straw Zn uptake) to 116.67 g ha−1, and TZnUp (total Zn uptake) to 230.3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum grain Zn uptake, 28.9 mg kg−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
grain Zn uptake (GZnUp)e2
Direction
maximume2
Value
28.9 mg kg−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum shoot Zn uptake, 192.9 g ha−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
ShZnUpe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
192.9 g ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum grain Zn concentration, 33.4 mg kg−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
GZnCe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
33.4 mg kg−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum grain Zn uptake, 125.06 g ha−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
GZnUpe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
125.06 g ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum straw Zn uptake, 125.26 g ha−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
SZnUpe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
125.26 g ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMC gave the maximum total Zn uptake, 250.3 g ha−1.

Treatment
PMCe2
Outcome
TZnUpe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
250.3 g ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the case of compost types, PMC resulted in maximum grain Zn uptake (GZnUp) (28.9 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (192.9 g ha−1), GZnC (33.4 mg kg−1), GZnUp (125.06 g ha−1), SZnUp (125.26 g ha−1), and TZnUp (250.3 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher shoot Zn concentration, 31.5 mg kg−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
ShZnCe3
Direction
highere3
Value
31.5 mg kg−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher shoot Zn uptake, 191.3 g ha−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
ShZnUpe3
Direction
highere3
Value
191.3 g ha−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher grain Zn concentration, 34.4 mg kg−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
GZnCe3
Direction
highere3
Value
34.4 mg kg−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher straw Zn concentration, 23.5 mg kg−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
SZnCe3
Direction
highere3
Value
23.5 mg kg−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher grain Zn uptake, 128.98 g ha−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
GZnUpe3
Direction
highere3
Value
128.98 g ha−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher straw Zn uptake, 129.29 g ha−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
SZnUpe3
Direction
highere3
Value
129.29 g ha−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn rate, 15 kg Zn ha−1, gave higher total Zn uptake, 258.3 g ha−1.

Treatment
highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1e3
Outcome
TZnUpe3
Direction
highere3
Value
258.3 g ha−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Zn levels, higher ShZnC (31.5 mg kg−1), ShZnUp (191.3 g ha−1), GZnC (34.4 mg kg−1), SZnC (23.5 mg kg−1), GZnUp (128.98 g ha−1), SZnUp (129.29 g ha−1), and TZnUp (258.3 g ha−1) were calculated with the use of the highest rate of 15 kg Zn ha−1, which was either statistically similar to or followed by 10 kg Zn ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1851 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake by different plant parts was strongly and positively correlated.

Organ / stage
different plant partse4
Outcome
uptake by different plant partse4
Direction
positivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e4

“A strong positive correlation was found among uptake by different plant parts (ZnG, ZnS, ShZnUp, GZnUp, SZnUp, and TZnUp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of PMC, 10 kg Zn ha−1 and ZnSB (+) improved Zn biofortification and uptake in wheat under Zn-deficient soils.

Treatment
combined application of PMC and 10 kg Zn ha−1 along with ZnSB (+)e5
Outcome
Zn biofortification and uptakee5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
Zn-deficient soilse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zinc Biofortification of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
e5

“the combined application of PMC and 10 kg Zn ha−1 along with ZnSB (+) improved Zn biofortification and uptake in wheat crop under Zn-deficient soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1998–2146 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.