Paper · 2017 · Nutrients

Agronomic Approach of Zinc Biofortification Can Increase Zinc Bioavailability in Wheat Flour and thereby Reduce Zinc Deficiency in Humans

Dunyi Liu; Yumin Liu; Wei Zhang; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency is a common disorder of humans in developing countries. The effect of Zn biofortification (via application of six rates of Zn fertilizer to soil) on Zn bioavailability in wheat grain and flour and its impacts on human health was evaluated. Zn bioavailability was estimated with a trivariate model that included Zn homeostasis in the human intestine. As the rate of Zn fertilization increased, the Zn concentration increased in all flour fractions, but the percentages of Zn in standard flour (25%) and bran (75%) relative to total grain Zn were constant. Phytic acid (PA) concentrations in grain and flours were unaffected by Zn biofortification. Zn bioavailability and the health impact, as indicated by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved, increased with the Zn application rate and were greater in standard and refined flour than in whole grain and coarse flour. The biofortified standard and refined flour obtained with application of 50 kg/ha ZnSO₄·7H₂O met the health requirement (3 mg of Zn obtained from 300 g of wheat flour) and reduced DALYs by >20%. Although Zn biofortification increased Zn bioavailability in standard and refined flour, it did not reduce the bioavailability of iron, manganese, or copper in wheat flour.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Zn fertilization increased Zn concentration in all wheat flour fractions.

Organ / stage
flour fractionse0
Treatment
Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the rate of Zn fertilization increased, the Zn concentration increased in all flour fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentages of Zn in standard flour and bran stayed constant relative to total grain Zn.

Outcome
percentages of Zn in standard flour (25%) and bran (75%) relative to total grain Zne0
Direction
constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentages of Zn in standard flour (25%) and bran (75%) relative to total grain Zn were constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytic acid concentrations in wheat grain and flour were unaffected by Zn biofortification.

Treatment
Zn biofortificatione0
Outcome
Phytic acid (PA) concentrations in grain and flourse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytic acid (PA) concentrations in grain and flours were unaffected by Zn biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeled Zn bioavailability increased with Zn application rate.

Treatment
Zn application ratee0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn bioavailability and the health impact, as indicated by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved, increased with the Zn application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeled disability-adjusted life years saved increased with Zn application rate.

Treatment
Zn application ratee0
Outcome
disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) savede0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the health impact, as indicated by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved, increased with the Zn application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Zn bioavailability was greater in standard and refined flour than whole grain and coarse flour.

Organ / stage
standard and refined floure0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
whole grain and coarse floure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn bioavailability and the health impact, as indicated by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved, increased with the Zn application rate and were greater in standard and refined flour than in whole grain and coarse flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeled health impact was greater for standard and refined flour than whole grain and coarse flour.

Organ / stage
standard and refined floure0
Outcome
disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) savede0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
whole grain and coarse floure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the health impact, as indicated by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved, increased with the Zn application rate and were greater in standard and refined flour than in whole grain and coarse flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortified standard and refined flour at 50 kg/ha ZnSO₄·7H₂O met the stated Zn health requirement.

Treatment
application of 50 kg/ha ZnSO₄·7H₂Oe0
Outcome
met the health requiremente0
Value
3 mg of Zn obtained from 300 g of wheat floure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biofortified standard and refined flour obtained with application of 50 kg/ha ZnSO₄·7H₂O met the health requirement (3 mg of Zn obtained from 300 g of wheat flour)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1063 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortified standard and refined flour reduced modeled DALYs by more than 20%.

Outcome
DALYse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced DALYs by >20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn biofortification did not reduce iron, manganese, or copper bioavailability in wheat flour.

Treatment
Zn biofortificatione7
Outcome
bioavailability of iron, manganese, or copper in wheat floure0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it did not reduce the bioavailability of iron, manganese, or copper in wheat flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1262 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although Zn biofortification increased Zn bioavailability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1148 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.