Paper · 2022 · Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources

Effect of Photoblastism on Rice Morphogenesis and Seedling Development

MN Hoque; MA Islam; MZ Islam; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of continuous light and complete dark period on seed germination to first leaf emergence was examined in BRRIdhan71 and BRRIdhan81 in controlled environment at 22 ± 2 ᵒC and 82± 2 % of relative humidity, with or without supplemental LED white light. In the dark, BRRIdhan71 had a germination rate of 97 percent and BRRIdhan81 had a germination rate of 57 percent. Germination was 92 percent in BRRIdhan81 and 77 percent in BRRIdhan71 under photoblastic conditions (Light). The dark and light treatments had a noticeable impact on the percentage of seeds that germinated. Coleoptile was longer in dark than light in BRRIdhan71. In both rice varieties, the light and dark treatments had little effect on the first leaf length, although the first leaf breadth increased noticeably in BRRIdhan81. The growth condition had an impact on root length, seedling fresh weight, and dry weight. Germination percent, coleoptile length, prophyll length, first leaf length, and root length all decreased in BRRIdhan71, whereas germination percent, first leaf length, first leaf breadth, seedling freash, and dry weight all increased significantly in BRRIdhan81.The findings imply that BRRIdhan71 and BRRIdhan81, in particular, responded to photoblastic treatment and predominantly possess photoblastic biocomponents in seed, which affect germination and subsequent growth phases. Rice seed during germinate in the field will light stress if photoblastism is not considered during the development and release of rice varieties for different seasons, such as Aman and Boro, because light affects seeding photomorphogenesis differently in different growth environments. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources, 13(1&2): 43-49, 2020

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, BRRIdhan71 germination was 97 percent.

Taxon
BRRIdhan71e0
Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Treatment
darke0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Value
97 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“In the dark, BRRIdhan71 had a germination rate of 97 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, BRRIdhan81 germination was 57 percent.

Taxon
BRRIdhan81e0
Material
BRRIdhan81e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Value
57 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“BRRIdhan81 had a germination rate of 57 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under light, BRRIdhan81 germination was 92 percent.

Taxon
BRRIdhan81e0
Material
BRRIdhan81e0
Treatment
photoblastic conditions (Light)e0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Value
92 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination was 92 percent in BRRIdhan81 and 77 percent in BRRIdhan71 under photoblastic conditions (Light)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under light, BRRIdhan71 germination was 77 percent.

Taxon
BRRIdhan71e0
Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Treatment
photoblastic conditions (Light)e0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Value
77 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination was 92 percent in BRRIdhan81 and 77 percent in BRRIdhan71 under photoblastic conditions (Light)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan71 coleoptiles were longer in darkness than light.

Taxon
BRRIdhan71e0
Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Treatment
darke0
Outcome
Coleoptilee0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
lighte0

Verbatim

e0

“Coleoptile was longer in dark than light in BRRIdhan71.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light and dark treatments had little effect on first leaf length in both rice varieties.

Taxon
rice varietiesOryza sativae0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
first leaf lengthe0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both rice varieties, the light and dark treatments had little effect on the first leaf length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–734 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan81 first leaf breadth increased noticeably under the light and dark treatments.

Taxon
BRRIdhan81e0
Material
BRRIdhan81e0
Outcome
first leaf breadthe0
Direction
increased noticeablye0

Verbatim

e0

“the first leaf breadth increased noticeably in BRRIdhan81”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth conditions affected root length and seedling fresh and dry weights.

Outcome
root length, seedling fresh weight, and dry weighte0
Qualifier
growth conditione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The growth condition had an impact on root length, seedling fresh weight, and dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–893 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan71 germination, coleoptile length, and prophyll length decreased.

Taxon
BRRIdhan71e0
Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Outcome
Germination percent, coleoptile length, prophyll lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percent, coleoptile length, prophyll length, first leaf length, and root length all decreased in BRRIdhan71”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan71 first leaf and root lengths decreased.

Taxon
BRRIdhan71e0
Outcome
first leaf length, and root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percent, coleoptile length, prophyll length, first leaf length, and root length all decreased in BRRIdhan71”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan81 germination and first leaf length and breadth increased significantly.

Taxon
BRRIdhan81e0
Outcome
germination percent, first leaf length, first leaf breadthe0
Direction
increased significantlye0

Verbatim

e0

“germination percent, first leaf length, first leaf breadth, seedling freash, and dry weight all increased significantly in BRRIdhan81”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan81 seedling fresh and dry weights increased significantly.

Taxon
BRRIdhan81e0
Outcome
seedling freash, and dry weighte0
Direction
increased significantlye0

Verbatim

e0

“seedling freash, and dry weight all increased significantly in BRRIdhan81”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1156 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.