Paper · 2022 · Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources

Effect of Red, Blue, Green LEDs on the Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice

MN Hoque; MZ Islam; M Rahman; et al.

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigations attempted to study the effects of red, blue and green LEDs effect on seed germination, first leaf length, first leaf blade length, root length, seedling fresh and dry weight. Seeds of five rice varieties were germinated and seedlings were grown under dark and red, blue, green LEDs lighting system (6 h photoperiod and 18 h dark) set at 20 to 24± 2 °C for day and night respectively and 70 ± 2 % relative humidity in a control chamber for 14 days (starting 3 days after plated for germination). The result showed that germination percent increased significantly in BRRIdhan52 and BRRIdhan75 under red-blue-green LEDs than dark. First leaf length increased in dark than LEDs treatment. Longest leaf (10.42 cm) was recorded in BRRIdhan86 in dark and under LEDs in BRRIdhan75 (5.70 cm). First leaf blade length was highest in BRRIdhan52 (2.56 cm) under LEDs treatment and in dark BRRIdhan67 had the longest (2.48 cm). Root length was also increased significantly in studied rice varieties. Though, longest root was found in dark in BRRIdhan71 (6.69 cm) and under LEDs, BRRIdhan71 had the longest root (6.35 cm). Seedling fresh and dry weight were highest under red-blue-dark LEDs treatment. BRRIdhan86 had the highest and BRRIdhan67 had the lowest seedling fresh and dry weight with a range of 0.323g to 0.451g and 0.037g to 0.052g respectively than dark condition. Root length showed positive significant correlation with seedling fresh weight (r = 0.876) and seedling dry weight (r = 0.873). Whereas seedling fresh weight showed complete correlation (r = 1) with seedling dry weight. Response index was negative for first leaf length in the studied rice varieties. Highest response index (35.93) was observed for seedling fresh and dry weight in BRRIdhan75 and BRRIdhan86. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources, 13(1&2): 63-69, 2020

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue-green LEDs increased germination in BRRIdhan52 and BRRIdhan75 versus dark.

Material
BRRIdhan52 and BRRIdhan75e0
Treatment
red-blue-green LEDse0
Outcome
germination percente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination percent increased significantly in BRRIdhan52 and BRRIdhan75 under red-blue-green LEDs than dark.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First leaf length was greater in darkness than under LEDs.

Treatment
darke0
Outcome
First leaf lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
LEDs treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First leaf length increased in dark than LEDs treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness BRRIdhan86 had the longest leaf, 10.42 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan86e0
Outcome
Longest leafe0
Direction
Longeste0
Value
10.42 cme0
Setting
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longest leaf (10.42 cm) was recorded in BRRIdhan86 in dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under LEDs BRRIdhan75 had the longest leaf, 5.70 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan75e0
Outcome
BRRIdhan75e0
Value
5.70 cme0
Setting
under LEDse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under LEDs in BRRIdhan75 (5.70 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under LEDs BRRIdhan52 had the highest first leaf blade length, 2.56 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan52e0
Outcome
First leaf blade lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.56 cme0
Setting
under LEDs treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First leaf blade length was highest in BRRIdhan52 (2.56 cm) under LEDs treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness BRRIdhan67 had the longest blade, 2.48 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan67e0
Outcome
longeste0
Value
2.48 cme0
Setting
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in dark BRRIdhan67 had the longest (2.48 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length increased significantly in the rice varieties.

Outcome
Root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length was also increased significantly in studied rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan71 had the longest root in darkness, 6.69 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Outcome
longest roote0
Value
6.69 cme0
Setting
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longest root was found in dark in BRRIdhan71 (6.69 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan71 had the longest root under LEDs, 6.35 cm.

Material
BRRIdhan71e0
Outcome
longest roote0
Value
6.35 cme0
Setting
under LEDse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under LEDs, BRRIdhan71 had the longest root (6.35 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dry seedling weight were highest under red-blue-dark LEDs.

Treatment
red-blue-dark LEDs treatmente0
Outcome
Seedling fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling fresh and dry weight were highest under red-blue-dark LEDs treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRIdhan86 had highest fresh and dry seedling weight, BRRIdhan67 lowest.

Material
BRRIdhan86e0
Outcome
seedling fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
BRRIdhan67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BRRIdhan86 had the highest and BRRIdhan67 had the lowest seedling fresh and dry weight with a range of 0.323g to 0.451g and 0.037g to 0.052g respectively than dark condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length correlated positively with fresh weight, r = 0.876.

Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
seedling fresh weighte0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.876e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length showed positive significant correlation with seedling fresh weight (r = 0.876)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length correlated positively with dry weight, r = 0.873.

Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
seedling dry weighte0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.873e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length showed positive significant correlation with seedling fresh weight (r = 0.876) and seedling dry weight (r = 0.873).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dry seedling weights were perfectly correlated, r = 1.

Outcome
seedling dry weighte0
Direction
complete correlatione0
Value
r = 1e0
Comparator
seedling fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling fresh weight showed complete correlation (r = 1) with seedling dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First leaf length response index was negative.

Organ / stage
first leafe0
Outcome
Response indexe0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response index was negative for first leaf length in the studied rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1690 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest fresh and dry weight response index was 35.93 in BRRIdhan75 and BRRIdhan86.

Material
BRRIdhan75 and BRRIdhan86e0
Outcome
response indexe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
35.93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest response index (35.93) was observed for seedling fresh and dry weight in BRRIdhan75 and BRRIdhan86.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.