Paper · 2022 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Enriched‐biochar application increases broccoli nutritional and phytochemical content without detrimental effect on yield

Daniel Montoya; Juan Antonio Fernández; José Antonio Franco; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Soil fertility is a major concern during vegetable production. Conventional versus organic fertilization has been studied in order to conserve soil properties. While some reports point out an increase in food nutritional properties, the loss of crop yield under organic conditions continues to be a problem. Thus, an experiment with broccoli in the field was carried out, comparing crop management under conventional fertilization (CF) and two soil amendment treatments: manure pellet (M) and an enriched‐biochar (EB) supplemented by an organic fertilizer (AND) applied alone (M + CF; EB+AND) or in combination (M + EB + AND). Crop yield and the nutritional properties in the flowering heads (mineral content, phenolic compounds and glucosinolates (GSLs)), were determined. RESULTS Enriched‐biochar and manure as a standalone amendment resulted in higher crop yield regarding CF, but not when they were applied in combination. The number of flowering heads with no‐commercial characteristics was lower after enriched‐biochar soil application. Finally, enriched‐biochar treatment enhanced NO 3 − , PO 4 3− and SO 4 2− levels in the flowering heads, and some of the ion contents can be associated with mineral changes in the soil after the biochar amendment. Also, the contents of phenolic compounds and indole GSLs were higher after enriched‐biochar application compared with the other treatments, GSL increase being due to the higher percentage of sulfur in the plant rather that an adequate N/S ratio. CONCLUSION Application of enriched‐biochar amendment in the cultivation of broccoli is appropriate, since there are no losses of yield and an increase in nutritional compounds in the flowering heads. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched-biochar alone gave higher broccoli crop yield than conventional fertilization.

Treatment
Enriched‐biochare1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2
Setting
fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enriched‐biochar and manure as a standalone amendment resulted in higher crop yield regarding CF, but not when they were applied in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–945 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment with broccoli in the field was carried out, comparing crop management under conventional fertilization (CF) and two soil amendment treatments: manure pellet (M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure pellet alone gave higher broccoli crop yield than conventional fertilization.

Treatment
manure pellete2
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2
Setting
fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enriched‐biochar and manure as a standalone amendment resulted in higher crop yield regarding CF, but not when they were applied in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–945 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment with broccoli in the field was carried out, comparing crop management under conventional fertilization (CF) and two soil amendment treatments: manure pellet (M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure and enriched-biochar application did not increase broccoli crop yield over conventional fertilization.

Treatment
M + EB + ANDe3
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2
Setting
fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enriched‐biochar and manure as a standalone amendment resulted in higher crop yield regarding CF, but not when they were applied in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–945 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment with broccoli in the field was carried out, comparing crop management under conventional fertilization (CF) and two soil amendment treatments: manure pellet (M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–508 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied alone (M + CF; EB+AND) or in combination (M + EB + AND)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched-biochar application lowered the number of flowering heads with non-commercial characteristics in broccoli.

Treatment
enriched‐biochar soil applicatione4
Outcome
flowering heads with no‐commercial characteristicse4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of flowering heads with no‐commercial characteristics was lower after enriched‐biochar soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched-biochar treatment increased NO3-, PO4 3- and SO4 2- levels in broccoli flowering heads.

Treatment
enriched‐biochar treatmente5
Outcome
NO 3 − , PO 4 3− and SO 4 2− levelse5
Direction
enhancede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“enriched‐biochar treatment enhanced NO 3 − , PO 4 3− and SO 4 2− levels in the flowering heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1166 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some ion contents in broccoli heads may be associated with mineral changes in the soil after biochar amendment.

Treatment
biochar amendmente6
Outcome
ion contentse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“some of the ion contents can be associated with mineral changes in the soil after the biochar amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic compounds and indole glucosinolates were higher in broccoli after enriched-biochar application than with the other treatments.

Treatment
enriched‐biochar applicatione7
Outcome
contents of phenolic compounds and indole GSLse7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
the other treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“the contents of phenolic compounds and indole GSLs were higher after enriched‐biochar application compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1415 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GSL increase in broccoli is attributed to a higher sulfur percentage in the plant rather than to an adequate N/S ratio.

Compound
sulfure7
Outcome
GSL increasee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“GSL increase being due to the higher percentage of sulfur in the plant rather that an adequate N/S ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1521 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend enriched-biochar amendment in broccoli cultivation because yield is not lost and nutritional compounds increase.

Outcome
Application of enriched‐biochar amendment in the cultivation of broccolie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of enriched‐biochar amendment in the cultivation of broccoli is appropriate, since there are no losses of yield and an increase in nutritional compounds in the flowering heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1721 · show in text ↑

application · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.