Paper · 2022 · Zoological and Entomological Letters

a

Mohamed Elimem; Rym Jaouadi; Maha Kalboussi; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficiency of Basalt as foliar spray with two doses (1.5% and 3%), in the ground as a fertilizer (1.5%), and as a combined application (1.5%) compared to two botanical aqueous extracts of bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) and Nerium (Nerium oleander) (50g/l against Ceratitis Capitata and Phyllocnistis citrella in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata, results a repellent effect exerted by used products. Trapped adults mean number in all treated units significantly decreased after first treatment and was maintained at very significant low values compared with control. Regarding P. citrella, alive larvae population decreased considerably after first treatment and reached low values. Larvae mortality rates in treated plots were observed since the first day after first treatment. They increased lately till reaching mean values ranking between 80 and 100% one and two weeks after second treatment. Efficacy rates of basalt were about 60, 51 and 39% respectively for foliar applications at 3% and 1.5% and the combined application. Regarding plant extracts, they were about 50 and 56% respectively for Nerium and bitter orange. These results will help in planning integrated pest management in citrus orchard to control C. capitata and P. citrella in order to ovoid use of pesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments repelled C. capitata.

Taxon
citrusCitruse1
Treatment
used productse0
Interactor
C. capitataCeratitis capitatae0pest
Outcome
repellent effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratitis capitata
Ceratitis capitata · InteractorScott Bauer, U.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concerning C. capitata, results a repellent effect exerted by used products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–449 · show in text ↑
e1

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapped C. capitata adults decreased significantly after first treatment versus control and remained low.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
all treated unitse0
Interactor
C. capitataCeratitis capitatae1pest
Outcome
Trapped adults mean numbere0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
after first treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratitis capitata
Ceratitis capitata · InteractorScott Bauer, U.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trapped adults mean number in all treated units significantly decreased after first treatment and was maintained at very significant low values compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alive P. citrella larvae decreased considerably after first treatment.

Taxon
citrusCitruse1
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae0pest
Outcome
alive larvae populatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding P. citrella, alive larvae population decreased considerably after first treatment and reached low values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–732 · show in text ↑
e1

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. citrella larval mortality increased to 80–100% one to two weeks after second treatment.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
Larvae mortality ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80 and 100%e0
Qualifier
one and two weeks after second treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larvae mortality rates in treated plots were observed since the first day after first treatment. They increased lately till reaching mean values ranking between 80 and 100% one and two weeks after second treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–947 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basalt foliar application at 3% had about 60% efficacy against P. citrella.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
foliar applications at 3%e0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
Efficacy rates of basalte0
Value
60e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy rates of basalt were about 60, 51 and 39% respectively for foliar applications at 3% and 1.5% and the combined application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basalt foliar application at 1.5% had about 51% efficacy against P. citrella.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
foliar applications at 3% and 1.5%e0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
Efficacy rates of basalte0
Value
51e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy rates of basalt were about 60, 51 and 39% respectively for foliar applications at 3% and 1.5% and the combined application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined basalt application had about 39% efficacy against P. citrella.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
Efficacy rates of basalte0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy rates of basalt were about 60, 51 and 39% respectively for foliar applications at 3% and 1.5% and the combined application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nerium extract had about 50% efficacy against P. citrella.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
Neriume0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
plant extractse0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding plant extracts, they were about 50 and 56% respectively for Nerium and bitter orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitter orange extract had about 56% efficacy against P. citrella.

Taxon
citrusCitruse2
Treatment
bitter orangee0
Interactor
P. citrellaPhyllocnistis citrellae1pest
Outcome
plant extractse0
Value
56%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocnistis citrella
Phyllocnistis citrella · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding plant extracts, they were about 50 and 56% respectively for Nerium and bitter orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding P. citrella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in citrus orchard. Concerning C. capitata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–396 · show in text ↑

application · Phyllocnistis citrella · CitrusResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.