Paper · 2022 · Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii

RESULTS OF THE TEST OF NEW GENERATION GEL FERTILIZERS ON THE TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY IN THE MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; K.F. ZARIPOVA; A.K. RADZHABOV

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The article assesses the effect of gel fertilizers on growth (average shoot length and bush growth in general), grape productivity, quality and transportability. Studies on the effect of new generation mineral gel fertilizers on the table grape of the Italy variety in the Mountain Valley Crimea proved their positive impact on growth, yield and quality of grape plants. There was a significant increase in phytometric indicators in the experimental variant compared to the reference: the average length of one-year shoots – by 17.7 cm (9.9%) and growth of the bush – 153.6 cm3 (7.8%). The yield increase when using new generation fertilizers was 2.2 t/ha (11.2%), mainly due to a significant increase in the average bunch weight. The use of gel fertilizers has improved the transportability of the bunches and grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel fertilizer treatment increased average one-year shoot length by 17.7 cm (9.9%) relative to reference.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
ITALYt0
Treatment
experimental variante0
Outcome
average length of one-year shootse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.7 cm (9.9%)e0
Comparator
referencee0
Setting
MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEAt1

Verbatim

t0

“TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in phytometric indicators in the experimental variant compared to the reference: the average length of one-year shoots – by 17.7 cm (9.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel fertilizer treatment increased bush growth by 153.6 cm3 (7.8%) relative to reference.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
ITALYt0
Treatment
experimental variante0
Outcome
growth of the bushe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
153.6 cm3 (7.8%)e0
Comparator
referencee0
Setting
MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEAt1

Verbatim

t0

“TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in phytometric indicators in the experimental variant compared to the reference: the average length of one-year shoots – by 17.7 cm (9.9%) and growth of the bush – 153.6 cm3 (7.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New generation fertilizers increased grape yield by 2.2 t/ha (11.2%).

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
ITALYt0
Treatment
new generation fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.2 t/ha (11.2%)e0
Setting
MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEAt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield increase when using new generation fertilizers was 2.2 t/ha (11.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel fertilizers significantly increased average bunch weight.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
ITALYt0
Treatment
experimental variante1
Outcome
average bunch weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEAt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in the average bunch weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase in phytometric indicators in the experimental variant compared to the reference: the average length of one-year shoots – by 17.7 cm (9.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel fertilizers improved transportability of grape bunches and grapes.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
ITALYt0
Treatment
gel fertilizerse0
Outcome
transportability of the bunches and grapese0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEAt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TABLE GRAPE OF THE ITALY VARIETY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“MOUNTAIN VALLEY CRIMEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“gel fertilizers has improved the transportability of the bunches and grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–817 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.