Paper · 2022 · FLORA AND FAUNA

Assessment of yield and quality parameters of irrigated wheat under soil and foliarapplication of nutrients

Vishal Gupta; Girish Goyal; S. S. Tomar

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted during the Rabi –2020-21 at experimental Farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, ITM University, Gwalior Madhya Pradesh to evaluated the combined effect of soil and foliar applications of nutrients on the growth, yield, protein content and its economics in wheat (Variety, RVW-4106).The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) having three replications. The experiment consisted of eight treatment viz. T1 :Control, T2 : RDF(120 : 60 : 40 kg NPK ha-1), T3 : 50% RDF + foliar spray of 19:19:19 (1%) at 40 & 75 DAS, T4 : 75% RDF + foliar spray of 19:19:19 (1%) at 40 & 75 DAS, T5 : 50% RDF + foliar spray of 19:19:19 (1%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) at 40 & 75 DAS, T6 : 75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 (1%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) at 40 & 75 DAS, T7 : RDF+ foliar spray of ZnSO4 (0.5%) at 40 & 75 DAS and T8 : RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 (0.5%) + FeSO4 (0.5%) at 40 & 75 DAS. The findings of the present study indicated that foliar application of either ZnSO4 or ZnSO4 + FeSO4 at 40 & 75 DAS with RDF recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes characters of wheat as compared to alone RDF which was comparable to 75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4 and 75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 treatment. The maximum grain yield (44.00 q ha-1) recorded with treatment T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4) closely followed by T7 (RDF+ foliar spray of ZnSO4) and T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4) treatments with 43.52 and 42.57 q ha-1 grain yield. Whereas, The maximum net return of Rs. 69746 ha-1 was recorded under T7 (RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4) followed by T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4) with Rs. 68908 ha-1The maximum benefit cost ratio of 3.10 was recorded with T7 ((RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4) treatment followed by T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4) with B:C ratio of 3.09.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 with RDF increased wheat growth and yield attributes versus RDF alone.

Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
growth and yield attributes characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
alone RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of either ZnSO4 or ZnSO4 + FeSO4 at 40 & 75 DAS with RDF recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes characters of wheat as compared to alone RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 plus FeSO4 with RDF increased wheat growth and yield attributes versus RDF alone.

Treatment
ZnSO4 + FeSO4e0
Outcome
growth and yield attributes characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
alone RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of either ZnSO4 or ZnSO4 + FeSO4 at 40 & 75 DAS with RDF recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes characters of wheat as compared to alone RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the maximum grain yield of 44.00 q ha-1.

Treatment
T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.00 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (44.00 q ha-1) recorded with treatment T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave 43.52 q ha-1 grain yield.

Treatment
T7 (RDF+ foliar spray of ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
43.52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T7 (RDF+ foliar spray of ZnSO4) and T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4) treatments with 43.52 and 42.57 q ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave 42.57 q ha-1 grain yield.

Treatment
T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
42.57 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4) treatments with 43.52 and 42.57 q ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the maximum net return of Rs. 69746 ha-1.

Treatment
T7 (RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 69746 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net return of Rs. 69746 ha-1 was recorded under T7 (RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave net return of Rs. 68908 ha-1.

Treatment
T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4)e0
Outcome
Rs. 68908 ha-1e0
Value
Rs. 68908 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T8 (RDF + foliar spray of ZnSO4 + FeSO4) with Rs. 68908 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 achieved the maximum benefit cost ratio of 3.10.

Treatment
T7 ((RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum benefit cost ratio of 3.10 was recorded with T7 ((RDF+ 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 achieved a benefit cost ratio of 3.09.

Treatment
T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
3.09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 (75% RDF+ foliar spray of 19:19:19 + ZnSO4) with B:C ratio of 3.09”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.