Abstract
Wheat is one of the most essential foods in the world. To increase its productivity, nutrient management is one of the most important factors. To assess the possible role of micronutrients in improving wheat yield, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the wheat performance by foliar application of micronutrients. Treatments consist of T1 = No spray, T2 = Spraying plants with tube well water (control), T3 = Spraying plants with 1.6 kg FeSO4/100 L water/acre, T4 = Spraying plants with 3 kg ZnSO4 (21%)/100 L water/acre, T5 = Spraying plants with 1 kg MnSO4/100 L water/acre, T6 = Spraying plants with (FeSO4 + MnSO4), T7 = Spraying plants with (FeSO4 + ZnSO4), T8 = Spraying plants with (ZnSO4 + MnSO4), and T9 = Spraying plants with (FeSO4 + ZnSO4 + MnSO4). Results showed that foliar application of micronutrients substantially improved plant height, spike length cm, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, test weight, Tillers m-2, grain and biological as well as harvest index of wheat. Among treatments, foliar application of FeSO4 + ZnSO4 + MnSO4 remained comparatively better regarding yield related attributes of whea
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients improved wheat height, spike length, and spikelets per spike.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- plant height, spike length cm, spikelets/spikee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar application of micronutrients substantially improved plant height, spike length cm, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, test weight, Tillers m-2, grain and biological as well as harvest index of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients improved wheat grains per spike, test weight, and tiller density.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- grains/spike, test weight, Tillers m-2e0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar application of micronutrients substantially improved plant height, spike length cm, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, test weight, Tillers m-2, grain and biological as well as harvest index of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients improved wheat grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- grain and biological as well as harvest indexe0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar application of micronutrients substantially improved plant height, spike length cm, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, test weight, Tillers m-2, grain and biological as well as harvest index of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined FeSO4, ZnSO4, and MnSO4 spray was comparatively better for wheat yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application of FeSO4 + ZnSO4 + MnSO4e0
- Outcome
- yield related attributese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- comparativelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar application of FeSO4 + ZnSO4 + MnSO4 remained comparatively better regarding yield related attributes of whea”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →manganese(II) sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →micronutrient · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.