Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Nutrition

Impact of foliar application of iron and zinc fertilizers on grain iron, zinc, and protein contents in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Sewa Ram; Vipin Kumar Malik; Vikas Gupta; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Micronutrient deficiencies, particularly iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), are prevalent in a large part of the human population across the world, especially in children below 5 years of age and pregnant women in developing countries. Since wheat constitutes a significant proportion of the human diet, improving grain Fe and Zn content in wheat has become important in improving human health. Objective This study aimed to quantify the effect of foliar application of iron sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO 4 .7H 2 O) and zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) and their combination on grain Fe and Zn concentrations, as well as grain protein content (GPC). The study also aimed to assess the utility of these applications in large field conditions. Methods To address this issue, field experiments were conducted using 10 wheat cultivars and applying a foliar spray of FeSO 4 .7H 2 O (0.25%) and ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O (0.50%) separately (@400 L of solution in water per hectare during each spray) and in combination at two different crop growth stages (flowering and milking) for three consecutive crop seasons (2017–2020). The study used a split-plot design with two replications to assess the impact of foliar application on GFeC, GZnC, and GPC. In addition, an experiment was also conducted to assess the effect of soil (basal) @ 25 kg/ha ZnSO 4 , foliar @ 2 kg/ha, ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O (0.50%), and the combination of basal + foliar application of ZnSO 4 on the grain micronutrient content of wheat cultivar WB 02 under large field conditions. Results GFeC increased by 5.1, 6.1, and 5.9% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively. GZnC increased by 5.2, 39.6, and 43.8% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively. DBW 173 recorded the highest increase in GZnC at 56.9% with the combined foliar application of FeSO 4 and ZnSO 4 , followed closely by HPBW 01 at 53.0% with the ZnSO 4 foliar application, compared to the control. The GPC increased by 6.8, 4.9, and 3.3% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively. Large-plot experiments also exhibited a significant positive effect of ZnSO 4 not only on grain Zn (40.3%, p ≤ 0.001) and protein content ( p ≤ 0.05) but also on grain yield ( p ≤ 0.05) and hectoliter weight ( p ≤ 0.01), indicating the suitability of the technology in large field conditions. Conclusion Cultivars exhibited a slight increase in GFeC with solitary foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination. In contrast, a significant increase in GZnC was observed with the foliar application of ZnSO 4 and the combined application of FeSO 4 and ZnSO 4 . In terms of GPC, the most significant enhancement occurred with the foliar application of FeSO 4 , followed by ZnSO 4 and their combination. Data demonstrated the significant effect of foliar application of ZnSO 4 on enhancing GZnC by 39.6%. Large plot experiments also exhibited an increase of 40.3% in GZnC through the foliar application of ZnSO 4 , indicating the effectiveness of the technology to be adopted in the farmer’s field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GFeC by 5.1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FeSO 4e0
Outcome
GFeCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GFeC increased by 5.1, 6.1, and 5.9% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GFeC by 6.1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
GFeCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GFeC increased by 5.1, 6.1, and 5.9% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

their combination foliar application increased wheat GFeC by 5.9%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
GFeCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GFeC increased by 5.1, 6.1, and 5.9% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GZnC by 5.2.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FeSO 4e0
Outcome
GZnCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GZnC increased by 5.2, 39.6, and 43.8% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GZnC by 39.6.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
GZnCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GZnC increased by 5.2, 39.6, and 43.8% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

their combination foliar application increased wheat GZnC by 43.8%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
GZnCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GZnC increased by 5.2, 39.6, and 43.8% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GPC by 6.8.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FeSO 4e0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GPC increased by 6.8, 4.9, and 3.3% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO 4 foliar application increased wheat GPC by 4.9.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GPC increased by 6.8, 4.9, and 3.3% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

their combination foliar application increased wheat GPC by 3.3%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GPC increased by 6.8, 4.9, and 3.3% with foliar applications of FeSO 4 , ZnSO 4 , and their combination, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW 173 had the highest GZnC increase, 56.9%, under combined foliar application.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
DBW 173e0
Treatment
combined foliar application of FeSO 4 and ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
GZnCe0
Direction
highest increasee0
Value
56.9%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBW 173 recorded the highest increase in GZnC at 56.9% with the combined foliar application of FeSO 4 and ZnSO 4 , followed closely by HPBW 01 at 53.0% with the ZnSO 4 foliar application, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPBW 01 showed a 53.0% GZnC increase under ZnSO 4 foliar application versus control.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
HPBW 01e0
Treatment
ZnSO 4 foliar applicatione0
Outcome
GZnCe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
53.0%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBW 173 recorded the highest increase in GZnC at 56.9% with the combined foliar application of FeSO 4 and ZnSO 4 , followed closely by HPBW 01 at 53.0% with the ZnSO 4 foliar application, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large-plot ZnSO 4 application improved wheat grain Zn by 40.3%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
grain Zne0
Direction
positivee0
Value
40.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large-plot experiments also exhibited a significant positive effect of ZnSO 4 not only on grain Zn (40.3%, p ≤ 0.001) and protein content ( p ≤ 0.05) but also on grain yield ( p ≤ 0.05) and hectoliter weight ( p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2343 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large-plot ZnSO 4 application improved wheat protein content.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large-plot experiments also exhibited a significant positive effect of ZnSO 4 not only on grain Zn (40.3%, p ≤ 0.001) and protein content ( p ≤ 0.05) but also on grain yield ( p ≤ 0.05) and hectoliter weight ( p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2343 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large-plot ZnSO 4 application improved wheat grain yield.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large-plot experiments also exhibited a significant positive effect of ZnSO 4 not only on grain Zn (40.3%, p ≤ 0.001) and protein content ( p ≤ 0.05) but also on grain yield ( p ≤ 0.05) and hectoliter weight ( p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2343 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large-plot ZnSO 4 application improved wheat hectoliter weight.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
hectoliter weighte0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large-plot experiments also exhibited a significant positive effect of ZnSO 4 not only on grain Zn (40.3%, p ≤ 0.001) and protein content ( p ≤ 0.05) but also on grain yield ( p ≤ 0.05) and hectoliter weight ( p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2343 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–137 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Foliar ZnSO 4 yielded about two-fold greater shoot zinc concentrations than root zinc supply or foliar ZnO.

    Zinc Mobility in Wheat: Uptake and Distribution of Zinc Applied to Leaves or Roots · 2001 · compared with plants supplied with Zn in the root environment or via foliar spray of ZnO

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.